Search Results

Search found 40441 results on 1618 pages for 'function templates'.

Page 777/1618 | < Previous Page | 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784  | Next Page >

  • Works in Firefox but not IE

    - by Abs
    Hello all, I make use of the following to find a string in a particular element, if it exists, tick a checkbox. This works great on Firefox but not internet explorer (8). I am having trouble finding why. $.fn.searchString = function(str) { return this.filter('*:contains("' + str + '")'); }; var myID = $('div').searchString(files_array[i].substr(-4)); alert(myID);//[object object] alert(myID.children());//[object object] myID.children().attr('checked', true);//does not tick checkbox alert(myID.children().attr('checked'));//undefined Does IE not like the children() function? Thanks all for any help

    Read the article

  • Removing an element from an array (PHP)

    - by morpheous
    I want to remove an element from a PHP array (and shrink the array size). Just looking at the PHP docs, it seems this can be done using array_slice() and array_merge() so I am guessing (off the top of my head) that some combination of array_merge() and array_slice will work. However, array_slice() requires an index (not a key), so I'm not sure how to quickly cobble these functions together for a solution. Has anyone implemented such a function before?. I'm sure it must be only a few lines long, but I cant somehow get my head around it (its been one of those days) ... Actually, I just came up with this cheesy hack when writing up this question.... function remove_from_array(array $in, value) { return array_diff($in, (array)$value); } too ugly? or will it work (without any shocking side effects)?

    Read the article

  • Good Form for Random Number Generator?

    - by JackCJR
    I wanted to get a few opinions on doing a random number generator. I read through a couple different ways to do it and this is the way that I created after doing a little reading. Is it acceptable form? Any foreseeable issues? function master(){ function generate(){ var pickFrom= "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789"; var j = pickFrom.length; var i = Math.floor(Math.random()*j+1); //Generates a random number var code = pickFrom.charAt(i) //Picks a number based on what number was picked. document.write(code) } x = 1; while(x){ generate(); x--; } } master();

    Read the article

  • Using jquery statement within a jquery data object

    - by richardverbruggen
    As part of a jquery function u use this ajax post statement to get some reaction from a server. I want to pass some arguments to my test page. But these must be variables and are declared on the previous lines (iid and inst) How can i put these variables within the data object marked with the XX? iid = $(this).attr('iid'); inst = $(this).attr('inst'); $.post("test.php", { inst: XX, iid: XX},function(data){ alert("Data Loaded: " + data); });

    Read the article

  • (Strange) C++ linker error in constructor

    - by Microkernel
    I am trying to write a template class in C++ and getting this strange linker error and can't figureout the cause, please let me know whats wrong with this! Here is the error message I am getting in Visula C++ 2010. 1>------ Rebuild All started: Project: FlashEmulatorTemplates, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ 1> main.cpp 1> emulator.cpp 1> Generating Code... 1>main.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "public: __thiscall flash_emulator<char>::flash_emulator<char>(char const *,struct FLASH_PROPERTIES *)" (??0?$flash_emulator@D@@QAE@PBDPAUFLASH_PROPERTIES@@@Z) referenced in function _main 1>C:\Projects\FlashEmulator_templates\VS\FlashEmulatorTemplates\Debug\FlashEmulatorTemplates.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals ========== Rebuild All: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 skipped ========== Error message in g++ main.cpp: In function âint main()â: main.cpp:8: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to âchar*â /tmp/ccOJ8koe.o: In function `main': main.cpp:(.text+0x21): undefined reference to `flash_emulator<char>::flash_emulator(char*, FLASH_PROPERTIES*)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status There are 2 .cpp files and 1 header file, and I have given them below. emulator.h #ifndef __EMULATOR_H__ #define __EMULATOR_H__ typedef struct { int property; }FLASH_PROPERTIES ; /* Flash emulation class */ template<class T> class flash_emulator { private: /* Private data */ int key; public: /* Constructor - Opens an existing flash by name flashName or creates one with given FLASH_PROPERTIES if it doesn't exist */ flash_emulator( const char *flashName, FLASH_PROPERTIES *properties ); /* Constructor - Opens an existing flash by name flashName or creates one with given properties given in configFIleName */ flash_emulator<T>( char *flashName, char *configFileName ); /* Destructor for the emulator */ ~flash_emulator(){ } }; #endif /* End of __EMULATOR_H__ */ emulator.cpp #include <Windows.h> #include "emulator.h" using namespace std; template<class T>flash_emulator<T>::flash_emulator( const char *flashName, FLASH_PROPERTIES *properties ) { return; } template<class T>flash_emulator<T>::flash_emulator(char *flashName, char *configFileName) { return; } main.cpp #include <Windows.h> #include "emulator.h" int main() { FLASH_PROPERTIES properties = {0}; flash_emulator<char> myEmulator("C:\newEMu.flash", &properties); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • jQuery sequence

    - by Happy
    $(".item").each(function(){ var item_link = $(this).find("a").attr("href"); $(this).prepend('<div class="img_url"></div>'); var img_url = $('div.img_url', this); $.get(item_link, function(data) { var src = $('.poster img', data).attr('src'); img_url.html(src); }); }); Each .get should be started after the previous is finished. Now all the .get start in one time. Any idea?

    Read the article

  • PHP / XHTML. Should I place everything in echo tags?

    - by 110175914651386975417
    A quick question involving PHP development, I seem to be wondering about this more and more as I develop more complex sites. Basically say we have a basic PHP / XHTML inbox (messaging system). I perform checks at the top (check if user is logged in, check if user has correct permissions etc). Then use the 'header('location:www.abc.com)' function if the authentication fails. The question is do I write the rest of the inbox code in a huge 'else' block or just use standard html. I read somewhere about about it being bad to put any code after using the 'header' function.

    Read the article

  • PHP Passing Data to a Specific Class? (Data Encapsulation)

    - by Adam184
    I've learned that OOP is all about data encapsulation, but what about passing data between classes that have nothing to do with each other (would the below example be worthy of using extends)? class Dog { private $secretVar; public function getSecretVar() { $this->secretVar = 'psst... only for rainbow!'; return $this->secretVar; } } class Rainbow { public function __construct(Dog $Dog) { print_r($Dog->getSecretVar()); } } $Dog = new Dog(); $Rainbow = new Rainbow($Dog); // ... classes that don't need the $secretVar How would you encapsulate $secretVar for only classes Dog and Rainbow? As of now, anyone can call getSecretVar(), and I'm having a hard time allowing that to happen as it seems to defeat the whole point of encapsulation.

    Read the article

  • Subscribe to the 'complete' event of a .load() on a specific DOM element?

    - by DustMason
    Hi all, I already use both .live() and .bind('ajaxComplete') to accomplish certain related tasks, but I have found myself wanting to be able to listen for the 'complete' event of a specific DOM element which will call jQuery's .load() at various times. In this situation I don't want to listen for ALL complete events globally (unless someone can show me how to get the proper target from the event object returned by 'ajaxComplete'). I would like to be able to do something like this: $('.selector').load('url.php',{data:data},function(){ ... }); and then somewhere else, attach a handler to listen and execute some other code whenever that ajax call fires and completes: $('.selector').bind('complete',function(){ ... }); is there any way to do this? or must i always make use of the 'complete' event within the context of the load() method?

    Read the article

  • C Struct as an argument

    - by Brian
    I'm wondering what's the difference between sample1 and sample2. Why sometimes I have to pass the struct as an argument and sometimes I can do it without passing it in the function? and how would it be if samplex function needs several structs to work with? would you pass several structs as an argument? struct x { int a; int b; char *c; }; void sample1(struct x **z;){ printf(" first member is %d \n", z[0]->a); } void sample2(){ struct x **z; printf(" first member is %d \n", z[0]->a); // seg fault } int main(void) { struct x **z; sample1(z); sample2(); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Does a form gets closed after form.submit()?

    - by user281180
    I have the following code: $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: '<%=Url.Action("test","pepole") %>', data: $("#PeopleForm").submit(), contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "html", sucess: function() { }, error: function(request, status, error) { $("#NotSelectedList").html("Error: " & request.responseText); } }); The PeopleForm is displayed in a dialog. After the submit, the dialog gets closed. Is that normal? I don`t want the dialog to get closed after the submit. How can I do that?

    Read the article

  • contents().find() not producing the same result as changing selector context? - jQuery

    - by Alex
    Hello all, I have a function that looks somewhat like this: function(domObj) { var currentObj = $(domObj); ... currentObj.contents().find(".ws").after("foobar"); } My problem is that the above method of using .contents().find() is not working. "foobar" never gets stuffed after the specified dom element, represented by the selector, .ws However if I do this: $(".ws", currentObj).after("foobar"); Then the string, "foobar" gets appended every time. My question: Are not these two methods supposed to be equivilant? How/what am I doing wrong in my use of .contents().find() so that it is not working? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Do I really need to return Type::size_type?

    - by dehmann
    I often have classes that are mostly just wrappers around some STL container, like this: class Foo { public: typedef std::vector<whatever> Vec; typedef Vec::size_type; const Vec& GetVec() { return vec_; } size_type size() { return vec_.size() } private: Vec vec_; }; I am not so sure about returning size_type. Often, some function will call size() and pass that value on to another function and that one will use it and maybe pass it on. Now everyone has to include that Foo header, although I'm really just passing some size value around, which should just be unsigned int anyway ...? What is the right thing to do here? Is it best practice to really use size_type everywhere?

    Read the article

  • Javascript jQuery .click() callback references local variable from the calling method instead of cop

    - by Eric Freese
    The following jQuery Javascript code is included on an otherwise empty page. $(function() { for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) { element = $('<div>' + i + '</div>'); element.click(function() { alert(i); }); $('body').append(element); } }); The desired behavior is that this code should generate 10 div elements numbered from 0 to 9. When you click on a div element, an alert popup will show the number of the div element you clicked on (i.e. if a user clicks on the div element labeled '4', the alert popup should show the number 4). The alert popup instead shows the number 10 regardless of which div element is clicked on. How can I modify this code to make it behave in the desired way?

    Read the article

  • jquery problem where the returned data from an XML file seems inaccessible

    - by squeaker
    Hi all, I'm using an xml file to generate some links which i would like to then be able to click on to populate an input box: $(xmlResponse).find('types').each(function(){ var id = $(this).attr('id'); var type = $(this).find('type').text(); $('<span title=\"'+type+'\" class=\"type\">'+type+'</span>').appendTo('#types'); }); $('span.type').click(function() { var title = $(this).attr('title'); $("input[name='type']").val(title); }); But for some reason clicking on the liks does not populate the input box. It does work if the span is hard coded into the page for example: <span title="text to populate" class="type">test</span> I'm guessing that the XML is not getting loaded into the DOM in the right way (or something like that) Any Ideas?

    Read the article

  • jquery small issue I need help with

    - by Martin
    Hi I need help with a bit of jquery, I am renaming dropdown lists when a checkbox next to them is clicked. I want to get the selected option value of the dropdown called 'Prev' in the code below and assign to the checkbox that is clicked. I hope it makes sense. Thanks $('.mutuallyexclusive').live("click", function() { checkedState = $(this).attr('checked'); $('.mutuallyexclusive:checked').each(function() { $(this).attr('checked', false); $(this).attr('name', 'chk'); }); $(this).attr('checked', checkedState); if (checkedState) { jQuery('#myForm select[name=cat.parent_id]').attr('name', 'bar') // here is the bit i need help with var prev = $(this).prev('select').attr("name", 'cat.parent_id'); } else { var prev = $(this).prev('select').attr("name", 'dd'); } }); });

    Read the article

  • getResponseHeader('last-modified'); does not change value

    - by telexper
    var page = 'data/appointments/<? echo $_SESSION['name']; ?><? echo $_SESSION['last']; ?>App.html'; var lM; function checkModified(){ $.get(page, function(a,a,x){ var mod = x.getResponseHeader('last-modified'); alert (lM); alert ("page" +mod); }); } when i alert the last-modified from my page, it outputs the same value, even when when i deleted all my cookies and cache , deleted the file from the server and replace it. it still outputs one value Tue , Oct 23, 2012 3:37:41 GMT

    Read the article

  • Dereferencing confusion? What is this example here called?

    - by perf
    Considering this PHP example: class A { public function getB( ) { return new B(); } } class B { public function test( ) { echo "Hello"; } } I could use this: $a = new A( ); $b = $a->getB( ); $b->test( ); // Hello Or this: $a = new A(); $a->getB( )->test( ); // Hello Taking a closer look at the second example... What is the name of this form of expression? Does this have something to do with dereferencing? In which programming languages is this available? What other forms of this exist?

    Read the article

  • Flex Builder I want to go from titleWindow to a panel.

    - by dejaninic
    Hi. I'm building an user login page and I want to go from titleWindow to Panel. I'm suing following function but it always takes me back to parentApplication. My question is how can I go to my panel and not to Application page. I know that I'm using parentApplication but what should I use instead??? Here is a part of my code: private function handleLogin(event:ResultEvent):void { Alert.show("You have succesfully logged in.", "Information", Alert.OK, null, null, null, Alert.OK); parentApplication.accountPage.mainService.getAccount(); PopUpManager.removePopUp(this); }

    Read the article

  • why does the data property in an jquery ajax call override my return false?

    - by user315709
    hi, i have the following block of code: $("#contact_container form, #contact_details form").live( "submit", function(event) { $.ajax({ type: this.method, url: this.action, data: this.serialize(), success: function(data) { data = $(data).find("#content"); $("#contact_details").html(data); }, }); return false; } ; when i leave out the data: this.serialize(), it behaves properly and displays the response within the #contact_details div. however, when i leave it in, it submits the form, causing the page to navigate away. why does the presence of the data attribute negates the return false? (probably due to a bug that i can't spot...) also, is the syntax to my find statement correct? it comes back as "undefined" even though i use a debugger to check the ajax response and that id does exists. thanks, steve

    Read the article

  • jQuery filter selector, is this right?

    - by fire
    It seems to work ok but I don't know if this can be impoved on or not. I want to select any HTML tag that has a class of edit-text-NUM or edit-html-NUM and change the color of it. Here is what I am using... jQuery(document).ready(function(){ jQuery('*') .filter(function() { return this.className.match(/edit-(text|html)-\d/); }) .css({ 'color': '#ff0000' }); }); Does that look ok and is the regex ok? *edit: Also is this efficient? I am aware that using jQuery('*') might be a bit of a hog if it's a large page. It only has to work from <body> down so maybe it could be changed?

    Read the article

  • Javascript .removeChild() only deletes even nodes?

    - by user1476297
    first posting. I am trying dynamically add children DIV under a DIV with ID="prnt". Addition of nodes work fine no problem. However strange enough when it comes to deleted nodes its only deleting the even numbered nodes including 0. Why is this, I could be something stupid but it seem more like a bug. I could be very wrong. Please help Thank you in advance. <script type="text/javascript"> function displayNodes() { var prnt = document.getElementById("prnt"); var chlds = prnt.childNodes; var cont = document.getElementById("content"); for(i = 0; i < chlds.length; i++) { if(chlds[i].nodeType == 1) { cont.innerHTML +="<br />"; cont.innerHTML +="Node # " + (i+1); cont.innerHTML +="<br />"; cont.innerHTML +=chlds[i].nodeName; cont.innerHTML +="<br />"; } } } function deleteENodes() { var prnt = document.getElementById("prnt"); var chlds = prnt.childNodes; for(i = 0; i < chlds.length; i++) { if(!(chlds[i].nodeType == 3)) { prnt.removeChild(chlds[i]); } } } function AddENodes() { var prnt = document.getElementById("prnt"); //Only even nodes are deletable PROBLEM for(i = 0; i < 10; i++) { var newDIV = document.createElement('div'); newDIV.setAttribute("id", "c"+(i)); var text = document.createTextNode("New Inserted Child "+(i)); newDIV.appendChild(text); prnt.appendChild(newDIV); } } </script> <title>Checking Div Nodes</title> </head> <body> <div id="prnt"> Parent 1 </div> <br /> <br /> <br /> <button type="button" onclick="displayNodes()">Show Node Info</button> <button type="button" onclick="deleteENodes()">Remove All Element Nodes Under Parent 1</button> <button type="button" onclick="AddENodes()">Add 5 New DIV Nodes</button> <div id="content"> </div> </body>

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784  | Next Page >