Overhead of Perfmon -> direct to SQL Database

Posted by StuartC on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by StuartC
Published on 2011-03-15T00:05:02Z Indexed on 2011/03/15 0:11 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 511

HI All,

First up, I'm a total newb at Performance Monitoring. I'm looking to set up central performance monitoring of some boxes.

  • 2K3 TS ( Monitor General OS Perf & Session Specific Counters )
  • 2K8 R2 ( XenApp 6 = Monitor General OS Perf & Session Specific Counters )
  • File Server ( Standard File I/O )

My ultimate aim is to get as many counters/information, without impacting the clients session experience at all. Including counters specific to their sessions.

I was thinking it logging directly to a SQL on another server, instead of a two part process of blg file then relog to sql.

Would that work ok? Does anyone know the overhead of going straight to SQL from the client?

I've searched around a bit, but havent found so much information it can be overwhelming.

thanks

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about Windows

Related posts about windows-server-2008-r2