When does implementing MVVM not make sense

Posted by Kelly Sommers on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by Kelly Sommers
Published on 2011-08-01T02:14:52Z Indexed on 2012/10/21 11:19 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 247

Filed under:
|
|

I am a big fan of various patterns and enjoy learning new ones all the time however I think with all the evangelism around popular patterns and anti-patterns sometimes this causes blind adoption.

I think most things have individual pros and cons and it's important to educate what the cons are and when it doesn't make sense to make a particular choice. The pros are constantly advocated. "It depends" I think applies most times but the industry does a poor job at communicating what it depends ON.

Also many patterns surfaced from inheriting values from previous patterns or have derivatives, which each one brings another set of pros and cons to the table.

The sooner we are more aware of the trade off's of decisions we make in software architecture the sooner we make better decisions.

This is my first challenge to the community. Even if you are a big fan of said pattern, I challenge you to discover the cons and when you shouldn't use it.

Define when MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel) may not make sense in a particular piece of software and based on what reasons. MVVM has a set of pros and cons. Let's try to define them.

GO! :)

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about wpf

Related posts about Silverlight