Simplex noise vs Perlin noise

Posted by raRaRa on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by raRaRa
Published on 2011-06-22T11:52:14Z Indexed on 2013/10/25 21:55 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 417

I would like to know why Perlin noise is still so popular today after Simplex came out. Simplex noise was made by Ken Perlin himself and it was suppose to take over his old algorithm which was slow for higher dimensions and with better quality (no visible artifacts).

Simplex noise came out in 2001 and over those 10 years I've only seen people talk of Perlin noise when it comes to generating heightmaps for terrains, creating procedural textures, et cetera.

Could anyone help me out, is there some downside of Simplex noise? I heard rumors that Perlin noise is faster when it comes to 1D and 2D noise, but I don't know if it's true or not.

Thanks!

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about image-processing

Related posts about textures