Search Results

Search found 6123 results on 245 pages for 'unsigned char'.

Page 112/245 | < Previous Page | 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119  | Next Page >

  • Function naming: sendCharacter or receiveCharacter?

    - by bobobobo
    I'm trying to name a function that runs when a character is received by the object. For the caller, it should be named sendCharacter, so that it can call: object->sendCharacter( character ) ; That looks nice for the caller.. but for the receiver, it implements a method /// Called when this object is do something /// with a character /// from the caller void sendCharacter( char c ) ; So for the recipient class, it looks like this method will actually send a character out, not receive one. So then, I could call the function receiveCharacter /// Called when this object is do something /// with a character /// from the caller void receiveCharacter( char c ) ; But now the caller does this: object->receiveCharacter( character ) ; Which just looks odd. How can I better name this function?

    Read the article

  • What is wrong with this c strdup code?

    - by bstullkid
    Consider this code: char *strs[] = { "string1", "string2", NULL }; char *ptr1 = NULL, *ptr2 = NULL, *tmp; short iter = 0; tmp = ptr1; while (iter < 2) { tmp = strdup(strs[iter]); tmp = ptr2; iter++; } printf("1: %s\n2: %s\n", ptr1, ptr2); I want this to output "string1\nstring2\n" however str1 and str2 remain null. What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • function in c language

    - by sandy101
    Hello, I am practice the function in c and come across to the program .... include int main() { float a=15.5; char ch ='C'; printit(a,ch); return 0; } printit(a,ch) { printf("%f\n%c",a,ch); } I want to know that why the above program compile and not give the error as i understood so for is ... 1) The function in c must be declared with the specific prototype (but this program does not contain the prototype ) 2)why the program give the output 'x'for the char variable 3)can the function in c are capable of accepting the value without being declared about type in parameters like what has done in the function declaration .... plz.... help

    Read the article

  • Function argument treated as undeclared

    - by Mikulas Dite
    I've prepared this simple example which is not working for me #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> FILE *fp; char filename[] = "damy.txt"; void echo (char[] text) { fp = fopen(filename, "a"); fwrite(text, 1, strlen(text), fp); fclose(fp); printf(text); } int main () { echo("foo bar"); return 0; } It's supposed to write both to command window and to file. However, this gives compilation error - the text used in echo() is not declared. Does c need another declaration of the variable?

    Read the article

  • c++ fread changing fgetpos strangely

    - by Steve
    If I run: FILE* pFile = fopen("c:\\08.bin", "r"); fpos_t pos; char buf[5000]; int ret = fread(&buf, 1, 9, pFile); fgetpos(pFile, &pos); I get ret = 9 and pos = 9. However if I run FILE* pFile = fopen("c:\\08.bin", "r"); fpos_t pos; char buf[5000]; int ret = fread(&buf, 1, 10, pFile); fgetpos(pFile, &pos); ret = 10 as expected, but pos = 11! How can this be?

    Read the article

  • ASP/HTML problem with spaces and monofonts

    - by nickik
    I have a ASP has a Function that converts ä to &auml so far so good. I have lets say space for 10 char's if there are more cut them of if there are less fill the space up with &nbsp's. . Like this: test &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp but if i say "täst" it does this: te &auml t &nbsp It interprets the &auml not as one char it looks at it as 6 chars. Is there a clever way around that? This problem messes up my design because I need the right count of spaces. The whole thing goes into a big select box. Of you have to add a ; at the end of ever &... I could add them because the Editor would really interprt them.

    Read the article

  • c++: truth assignment warning with arguments?

    - by John
    I use the following to work with arguments in my programs, but it seems to just hand me a warning (just a warning): "warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value" The beginning of the code is as follows: enum{OPT_DISP_H = 0x2, OPT_DISP_W = 0x1}; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int opt = 0x00; char c; while((++argv)[0] && argv[0][0]=='-'){ while(c =* ++argv[0]) switch(c){ case 'h': opt |= OPT_DISP_H; break; //etc.. The while(c =* ++argv[0]) part being where the warning persists. The code works fine, but what does this warning mean opposed to what is used? I think the code is c = *++argv[0], using the pointer. So why does the single = work and what is really recommended to be used?

    Read the article

  • Const-Qualification of Main's Parameters in C++

    - by pt2cv
    The C++ standard mandates that all conforming implementations support the following two signatures for main: int main(); int main(int, char*[]); In case of the latter signature, would the addition of (top-level) const-ness break any language rules? For example: int main(const int argc, char** const argv); From my understanding, top-level const qualification doesn't affect the function's signature hash, so it should be legal as far as the specification is concerned. Also, did anyone ever encounter an implementation which rejected this type of modification?

    Read the article

  • How to check total cache size using a program

    - by user1888541
    so I'm having some trouble creating a program to measure cache size in C. I understand the basic concept of going about this but I'm still having trouble figuring out exactly what I am doing wrong. Basically, I create an array of varying length (going by power of 2s) and access each element in the array and put it in a dummy variable. I go through the array and do this around 1000 times to negate the "noise" that would otherwise occur if I only did it once to get an accurate measurement for time. Then, I look for the size that causes a big jump in access time. Unfortunately, this is where I am having my problem, I don't see this jump using my code and clearly I am doing something wrong. Another thing is that I used /proc/cpuinfo to check the cache and it said the size was 6114 but that was not a power of 2. I was told to go by powers of 2 to figure out the cache can anyone explain why this is? Here is the just of my code...I will post the rest if need be { struct timeval start; struct timeval end; // int n = 1; // change this to test different sizes int array_size = 1048576*n; // I'm trying to check the time "manually" first before creating a loop for the program to do it by itself this is why I have a separate "n" variable to increase the size char x = 0; int i =0, j=0; char *a; a =malloc(sizeof(char) * (array_size)); gettimeofday(&start,NULL); for(i=0; i<1000; i++) { for(j=0; j < array_size; j += 1) { x = a[j]; } } gettimeofday(&end,NULL); int timeTaken = (end.tv_sec * 1000000 + end.tv_usec) - (start.tv_sec *1000000 + start.tv_usec); printf("Time Taken: %d \n", timeTaken); printf("Average: %f \n", (double)timeTaken/((double)array_size); }

    Read the article

  • Class Members Over Exports

    - by VirusEcks
    When Using DLLs or Code-injecting to be Specific this is an example class only intended for explaining class test { int newint1; char newchararray[512]; void (*newfunction1)( int newarg1 ); int newfunction2( bool newarg1, char newarg2 ) { return newint1; } } mynewclass1; that covers most common elements that's included in classes now when exporting this function to another DLL or application and missed an element of those, either data member or function member, private or public what happens or changed their order ? and if each function is assigned it's value when Code-Injecting like mynewclass1.newfunction1 = (void *)(newexportedfunction); what's the happens in this case, if members of the class are pointers that are assigned after class construction and then missed one member or changed their order ?

    Read the article

  • Sort an array via x86 Assembly (embedded in C++)?? Possible??

    - by Mark V.
    I am playing around with x86 assembly for the first time and I can't figure out how to sort an array (via insertion sort).. I understand the algorithm, but assembly is confusing me as I primarily use Java & C++. Heres all I have so far int ascending_sort( char arrayOfLetters[], int arraySize ) { char temp; __asm{ push eax push ebx push ecx push edx push esi push edi //// ??? pop edi pop esi pop edx pop ecx pop ebx pop eax } } Basically nothing :( Any ideas?? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Objective-C: how to splt a string constant across multiple lines

    - by Ilya
    Hi, I have a pretty long sqlite query: const char *sql_query = "SELECT statuses.word_id FROM lang1_words, statuses WHERE statuses.word_id = lang1_words.word_id ORDER BY lang1_words.word ASC"; How can I break it in a number of lines to make it easier to read? If I do the following: const char *sql_query = "SELECT word_id FROM table1, table2 WHERE table2.word_id = table1.word_id ORDER BY table1.word ASC"; I am getting a error. Is there a way to write queries in multiple lines? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • How can I return to a string address and then assign it to a new string?

    - by Y_Y
    I have 1 function that I want to return the address of an assigned string to the main function and assign an new string pointer with the same address so that the new string will have the contents of the old string. For example: unknown_datatype function() { char *old = "THE STRING"; return old; } int main() { char *snew = ""; snew = function(); return 0; } *unknown_datatype means I don't know that to put there... *How can I approach this without changing anything in the main() method

    Read the article

  • Sending while receiving in C

    - by Spidfire
    I've made a piece of code in what's on my server, the problem is that it doesn't send while im receiving. so if i send something to client 1 to client 2, client2 only receives if he sends something himself.. how can i solve this ? /* Thread*/ while (! stop_received) { nr_bytes_recv = recv(s, buffer, BUFFSIZE, 0); if(strncmp(buffer, "SEND", 4) == 0) { char *message = "Text asads \n"; rv = send(users[0].s, message, strlen(message), 0); rv = send(users[1].s, message, strlen(message), 0); if (rv < 0) { perror("Error sending"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } }else{ char *message = "Unknown command \n"; rv = send(s, message, strlen(message), 0); if (rv < 0) { perror("Error sending"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } } }

    Read the article

  • How do I compare vectors in C++?

    - by Sam Phelps
    I am trying to compare two vector objects, and return a single vector containing all the chars which appear in both vectors. How would I go about this without writing some horribly complex manual method which compares every char in the first vector to every char in the second vector and using an if to add it to a third vector (which would be returned) if they match. Maybe my lack of real experience with vectors is making me imagine this will be harder than it really is, but I suspect there is some simplier way which I have been unable to find through searching.

    Read the article

  • Referencing invalid memory locations with C++ Iterators

    - by themoondothshine
    I am a big fan of GCC, but recently I noticed a vague anomaly. Using __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator (ie, the most common iterator type used in libstdc++, the C++ STL) it is possible to refer to an arbitrary memory location and even change its value without causing an exception! Is this expected behavior? If so, isn't a security loophole? Here's an example: #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main() { basic_string<char> str("Hello world!"); basic_string<char>::iterator iter = str.end(); iter += str.capacity() + 99999; *iter = 'x'; cout << "Value: " << *iter << endl; }

    Read the article

  • Using sizeof with a dynamically allocated array

    - by robUK
    Hello, gcc 4.4.1 c89 I have the following code snippet: #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> char *buffer = malloc(10240); /* Check for memory error */ if(!buffer) { fprintf(stderr, "Memory error\n"); return 1; } printf("sizeof(buffer) [ %d ]\n", sizeof(buffer)); However, the sizeof(buffer) always prints 4. I know that a char* is only 4 bytes. However, I have allocated the memory for 10kb. So shouldn't the size be 10240? I am wondering am I thinking right here? Many thanks for any suggestions,

    Read the article

  • Perl : How to print all cp1252 characters on by one ?

    - by Vinay
    Hi,i am not able to write a script to print all the latin -1 characters one by one.Can anybody help me in solving the problem? I am using the below code but it is not giving me expected result. foreach $char(0..255) { $hexval = sprintf("%x",$char); $charval = sprintf("%c",%hexval); print "$charval"; } output should be like :- 0065 - e 0066 - f ... ... 007F - character at the step For all the codepoints after 007F,it is not giving me expected results. Please help me out with this

    Read the article

  • Encryption By Certificate

    - by user1817240
    I am encrypting customer name in database at database level. While saving in database only first letter of customer name is saved and hence while decrypting only first letter is retrieved. The following code shows the test sp. ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spc_test_insert] ( @sFIRST_NAME typ_encryptedtext, ) AS BEGIN DECLARE @sSENCRYPTION_KEY char(15) DECLARE @sCERTIFICATE char(22) SET @sSENCRYPTION_KEY='SymmetricKey1' SET @sCERTIFICATE='CustomerCertificate' OPEN SYMMETRIC KEY SymmetricKey1 DECRYPTION BY CERTIFICATE CustomerCertificate; INSERT INTO test_table ( FIRST_NAME, ) Values ( -- Add the Params to be Added... EncryptByKey(Key_GUID(@sSENCRYPTION_KEY),@sFIRST_NAME), ) CLOSE SYMMETRIC KEY SymmetricKey1 END encryption decryption working fine in normal insert but its not working in stored procedure.

    Read the article

  • zeroing out memory

    - by robUK
    Hello, gcc 4.4.4 c89 I am just wondering what most c programmers do when they want to zero out memory. For example I have a buffer of 1024 bytes. Sometimes I do this: char buffer[1024] = {0}; Which will zero all bytes. However, should I declare like this and use memset? char buffer[1024]; . . memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer); Is there any real reason you have to zero the memory? What is the worst that can happen by not doing it? Many thanks for any suggestions,

    Read the article

  • C++ STL: Trouble with string iterators

    - by Rosarch
    I'm making a simple command line Hangman game. void Hangman::printStatus() { cout << "Lives remaining: " << livesRemaining << endl; cout << getFormattedAnswer() << endl; } string Hangman::getFormattedAnswer() { return getFormattedAnswerFrom(correctAnswer.begin(), correctAnswer.end()); } string Hangman::getFormattedAnswerFrom(string::const_iterator begin, string::const_iterator end) { return begin == end? "" : displayChar(*begin) + getFormattedAnswerFrom(++begin, end); } char Hangman::displayChar(const char c) { return c; } (Eventually, I'll change this so displayChar() displays a - or a character if the user has guessed it, but for simplicity now I'm just returning everything.) When I build and run this from VS 2010, I get a popup box: Debug Assertion Failed! xstring Line: 78 Expression: string iterator not dereferenceable What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • explain this macro

    - by deostroll
    #define __T(x) L ## x Found in code from one of the MFC source header file. It is mostly used for converting strings to ........ (I don't know what). If I am correct it converts strings to LPCTSTR...don't know what that type is either... I can't seem to convert char* into LPCTSTR. While MFC file handling, the following code will always return error while trying to open the file... char* filepath = "C:\\Program Files\\Microsoft Office\\Office12\\BITMAPS\\STYLES\\GLOBE.WMF"; if( !file.Open((LPCTSTR)filepath , CFile::modeRead, &fexp) ) { fexp.ReportError(); return 1; } But instead if I wrote it this way, it doesn't give error: if( !file.Open( _T("C:\\Program Files\\Microsoft Office\\Office12\\BITMAPS\\STYLES\\GLOBE.WMF") , CFile::modeRead, &fexp) ) { fexp.ReportError(); return 1; } I am looking at passing a variable as the first argument to the CFile::Open() method.

    Read the article

  • syntax error : missing ';' before identifier

    - by numerical25
    I am new to c++, trying to debug the following line of code class cGameError { string m_errorText; public: cGameError( char *errorText ) { DP1("***\n*** [ERROR] cGameError thrown! text: [%s]\n***\n", errorText ); m_errorText = string( errorText ); } const char *GetText() { return m_errorText.c_str(); } }; enum eResult { resAllGood = 0, // function passed with flying colors resFalse = 1, // function worked and returns 'false' resFailed = –1, // function failed miserably resNotImpl = –2, // function has not been implemented resForceDWord = 0x7FFFFFFF }; This header file is included in the program as followed #include "string.h" #include "stdafx.h" #include "Chapter 01 MyVersion.h" #include "cGameError.h"

    Read the article

  • Set argument pointer to point to new memory inside a function (without returning it) IN C

    - by user321605
    Hello, Hopefully my title was descriptive enough to attract the right help. I want to write a function that will return 1 thing, and modify a provided pointer in another. My current function declaration is . . . char * afterURL replaceURLS(char * body) What I want to do is copy all of body's data into a new string, and set body to point to this new data. I then want afterURL to point to a location within the new string. My issue is getting the actual pointer that is passed in to this function to point to the new data. Thanks in advance! Rob

    Read the article

  • how to create multiple tcp connections between server and client

    - by lowcosthighperformance
    I am new in Unix/Linux networking programming, so I have written server-client program in below.In this code there is one socket between client and server, client requests to server, then server responses from 1 to 100 numbers to client. So my question is how can we do this process with 3 socket( tcp connection) without using thread? ( e.g. First socket runs then second runs then third runs then first again .. ) Do you have any suggestion? Thank you client.c int main() { int sock; struct sockaddr_in sa; int ret; char buf[1024]; int x; sock = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); bzero (&sa, sizeof(sa)); sa.sin_family = AF_INET; sa.sin_port = htons(SERVER_PORT); inet_pton (AF_INET, SERVER_IP, &sa.sin_addr); ret = connect (sock, (const struct sockaddr *) &sa,sizeof (sa)); if (ret != 0) { printf ("connect failed\n"); exit (0); } x = 0; while (x != -1) { read (sock, buf , sizeof(int)); x = ntohl(*((int *)buf)); if (x != -1) printf ("int rcvd = %d\n", x); } close (sock); exit (0); } server.c int main() { int list_sock; int conn_sock; struct sockaddr_in sa, ca; socklen_t ca_len; char buf[1024]; int i; char ipaddrstr[IPSTRLEN]; list_sock = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); bzero (&sa, sizeof(sa)); sa.sin_family = AF_INET; sa.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY); sa.sin_port = htons(SERVER_PORT); bind (list_sock,(struct sockaddr *) &sa,sizeof(sa)); listen (list_sock, 5); while (1){ bzero (&ca, sizeof(ca)); ca_len = sizeof(ca); // important to initialize conn_sock = accept (list_sock,(struct sockaddr *) &ca,&ca_len); printf ("connection from: ip=%s port=%d \n",inet_ntop(AF_INET, &(ca.sin_addr), ipaddrstr, IPSTRLEN),ntohs(ca.sin_port)); for (i=0; i<100; ++i){ *((int *)buf) = htonl(i+20); // we using converting to network byte order write (conn_sock, buf, sizeof(int)); } * ((int *)buf) = htonl(-1); write (conn_sock, buf, sizeof(int)); close (conn_sock); printf ("server closed connection to client\n"); } }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119  | Next Page >