Search Results

Search found 10366 results on 415 pages for 'const char pointer'.

Page 314/415 | < Previous Page | 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321  | Next Page >

• Why can't i call Contains method from my array?

  - by xbnevan

  Arrrg!I am running into what i feel is a dumb issue with a simple script i'm writing in powershell. I am invoking a sql command that is calling a stored proc, with the results i put it a array. The results look something like this: Status ProcessStartTime ProcessEndTime ------ ---------------- -------------- Expired May 22 2010 8:31PM May 22 2010 8:32PM What i'm trying to do is if($s.Contains("Expired")) , report failed. Simple...? :( Problem i'm running into is it looks like Contains method is not being loaded as i get an error like this: Method invocation failed because [System.Object[]] doesn't contain a method named 'Contains'. At line:1 char:12 + $s.Contains <<<< ("Expired") + CategoryInfo : InvalidOperation: (Contains:String) [], RuntimeException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : MethodNotFound So, what can i do to stop powershell from unrolling it to string? Actual ps script below - $s = @(Invoke-Sqlcmd -Query "USE DB GO exec Monitor_TEST_ps 'EXPORT_RUN',NULL,20 " ` -ServerInstance "testdb002\testdb_002") if ($s.Contains("Expired")) { Write-Host "Expired found, FAIL." } else { Write-Host "Not found, OK." }

  Read the article

• Best way to access nested data structures?

  - by Blackshark

  I would like to know what the best way (performance wise) to access a large data structure is. There are about hundred ways to do it but what is the most accessible for the compiler to optimize? One can access a value by foo[someindex].bar[indexlist[i].subelement[j]].baz[0] or create some pointer aliases like sometype_t* tmpfoo = &foo[someindex]; tmpfoo->bar[indexlist[i].subelement[j]].baz[0] or create reference aliases like sometype_t &tmpfoo = foo[someindex]; tmpfoo.bar[indexlist[i].subelement[j]].baz[0] and so forth...

  Read the article

• Increase a recive buffer in UDP socket

  - by unresolved_external

  I'wm writing an app, which transmits video and obviously uses UDP protocol fot this purpose. So I am wondering how can I increase a size of send/recieve buffer, cause currently the maximal size of data, which I can send is 65000 bytes. I already tried to do it in following way: int option = 262144; if(setsockopt(m_SocketHandle,SOL_SOCKET,SO_RCVBUF ,(char*)&option,sizeof(option)) < 0) { printf("setsockopt failed\n"); } But it did not work. So how can I do it?

  Read the article

• Strange macro declaration in C

  - by Andrey Atapin

  Exploring libusb-1.0.9 source code, I have found such line (./os/poll_windows.c:78): #define CHECK_INIT_POLLING do {if(!is_polling_set) init_polling();} while(0) As for me this is the same like: #define CHECK_INIT_POLLING if(!is_polling_set) init_polling(); Is there any reason to loop that expression? UPDATE: I couldn't still realize what'd be wrong after the answers, and the following example helped: #include <stdio.h> #define TEST if(test) foo(); #define TEST_DO do { if(test) foo(); } while(0) int test = 1; void foo() { printf("%s", "Foo called"); } int main(int argc, char** argv) { if(argc > 1) TEST_DO; /* LINE 12 */ else printf("%s", "skipping..."); return 0; } If you put TEST at line 12, a compiler will give an error "error: ‘else’ without a previous ‘if’". Hope, this will help someone.

  Read the article

• Can't subtract in a for loop in C/Objective-C

  - by user1612935

  I'm going through the Big Nerd Ranch book on Objective-C, which takes you through some early C stuff. I've played with C before, and am pretty experienced in PHP. Anyhow, I'm doing the challenges and this one is not working the way I think it should. It's pretty simple - start at 99, loop through and subtract three until you get to zero, and every time you get a number that is divisible by 5 print "Found one." Pretty straightforward. However, subtracting by three in the for loop is not working #include <stdio.h> int main (int argc, const char * argv[]) { int i; for(i = 99; i > 0; i-3){ printf("%d\n", i); if(i % 5 == 0) { printf("Found one!\n"); } } return 0; } It creates and endless loop at 99, and I'm not sure why.

  Read the article

• Strange C++ thread function invocation

  - by Tony

  I have the following: class DThread { virtual void run()=0; _beginthreadex(NULL,0,tfunc,this,0,&m_UIThreadID); // class itself being passed as param to thread function... static unsigned int __stdcall tfunc(void* thisptr) { static_cast<DThread*>(thisptr)->run(); return 0; } //other stuff } The run function is implemented in a derived class. Why is the function that's being called in the thread being called through a cast this pointer? Is this good practise? Can't it just be called directly? The actual function needing to run is in the derived class. My question is

  Read the article

• How to cin Space in c++?

  - by Narek

  Say we have a code: int main() { char a[10]; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { cin>>a[i]; if(a[i] = ' ') cout<<"It is a space!!!"<<<endl; } return 0; } How to cin a Space symbol from command line? If you write space, program ignores! :(

  Read the article

• C++: Allocation of variables in a loop

  - by Rosarch

  Let's say I have a loop like this: vector<shared_ptr<someStruct>> vec; int i = 0; while (condition) { i++ shared_ptr<someStruct> sps(new someStruct()); WCHAR wchr[20]; memset(wchr, i, 20); sps->pwsz = wchr; vec.push_back(sps); } At the end of this loop, I see that for each sps element of the vector, sps->pwsz is the same. Is this because I'm passing a pointer to memory allocated in a loop, which is destructed after each iteration, and then refilling that same memory on the next iteration?

  Read the article

• How to make a rectangle on screen invisible to screen capture ?

  - by Kesarion

  How can I create a rectangle on the screen that is invisible to any sort of screen capture(printscreen or aplications) ? By create a rectangle on screen I mean something like this: #include <Windows.h> #include <iostream> void drawRect(){ HDC screenDC = ::GetDC(0); ::Rectangle(screenDC, 200, 200, 300, 300); ::ReleaseDC(0, screenDC); } int main(void){ char c; std::cin >> c; if (c == 'd') drawRect(); std::cin >> c; return 0; } I'm using Visual Studio 2010 on Windows XP

  Read the article

• How to define an array inside a function in C?

  - by Arunav Dev

  So in my source file I have the folowin function: void update(state* old_state, state* measurement, uint32_t size) { state new_state[size]; //some function using measurement and old_state and returning the result in newstate arm_fadd_32(measurement,old_state,newstate,size); // rest of the code } Now the compiler throws an error saying that error#28:expression must have a constant value. I think it's due to the fact that even though inside the method the size local variable is not changing the compiler is expecting a constant while defining the size. I have tried the following: int const a = size; and then tried to reinitialize it says constant value is not known. I did some research in internet and it appears that there is no easier way without using malloc, which I don't want to since I am using the code for some embedded application. Is there a way to avoid this problem without really using malloc? Thanks in advance guys!

  Read the article

• C++ Vector of vectors

  - by xbonez

  I have a class header file called Grid.h that contains the following 2 private data object: vector<int> column; vector<vector<int>> row; And a public method whose prototype in Grid.h is such: int getElement (unsigned int& col, unsigned int& row); The definition of above mentioned function is defined as such in Grid.cpp: int getElement (unsigned int& col, unsigned int& row) { return row[row][col] ; } When I run the program, I get this error: error C2109: subscript requires array or pointer type Whats going wrong?

  Read the article

• [C++] Needed: A simple C++ container (stack, linked list) that is thread-safe for writing

  - by conradlee

  I am writing a multi-threaded program using OpenMP in C++. At one point my program forks into many threads, each of which need to add "jobs" to some container that keeps track of all added jobs. Each job can just be a pointer to some object. Basically, I just need the add pointers to some container from several threads at the same time. Is there a simple solution that performs well? After some googling, I found that STL containers are not thread-safe. Some stackoverflow threads address this question, but none form a consensus on a simple solution.

  Read the article

• what's the meaning of ~0 in cpp or c

  - by rima

  Hi what's the meaning of ~0 in this code???? somebody can analysis this code for me? unsigned int Order(unsigned int maxPeriod = ~0) const { Point r = *this; unsigned int n = 0; while( r.x_ != 0 && r.y_ != 0 ) { ++n; r += *this; if ( n > maxPeriod ) break; } return n; } please help me soon....

  Read the article

• Best way to reverse a string in C# 2.0

  - by Guy

  I've just had to write a string reverse function in C# 2.0 (i.e. LINQ not available) and came up with this: public string Reverse(string text) { char[] cArray = text.ToCharArray(); string reverse = String.Empty; for (int i = cArray.Length - 1; i > -1; i--) { reverse += cArray[i]; } return reverse; } Personally I'm not crazy about the function and am convinced that there's a better way to do it. Is there?

  Read the article

• why nResult != nConvertedLen,when use CComBSTR;

  - by hxboxy

  CComBSTR wsData = (char*)pvData; when constuct CComBSTR,call A2WBSTR,but sometimes nResult != nConvertedLen,just 1/20. why? inline BSTR A2WBSTR(_In_opt_ LPCSTR lp, int nLen = -1) { if (lp == NULL || nLen == 0) return NULL; USES_CONVERSION_EX; BSTR str = NULL; #pragma warning(push) #pragma warning(disable: 6385) int nConvertedLen = MultiByteToWideChar(_acp_ex, 0, lp, nLen, NULL, NULL); #pragma warning(pop) int nAllocLen = nConvertedLen; if (nLen == -1) nAllocLen -= 1; // Don't allocate terminating '\0' str = ::SysAllocStringLen(NULL, nAllocLen); if (str != NULL) { int nResult; nResult = MultiByteToWideChar(_acp_ex, 0, lp, nLen, str, nConvertedLen); ATLASSERT(nResult == nConvertedLen); if(nResult != nConvertedLen) { SysFreeString(str); return NULL; } } return str; }

  Read the article

• lambda+for_each+delete on STL containers

  - by rubenvb

  I'm trying to get a simple delete every pointer in my vector/list/... function written with an ultra cool lambda function. Mind you, I don't know c**p about those things :) template <typename T> void delete_clear(T const& cont) { for_each(T.begin(), T.end(), [](???){ ???->delete() } ); T.clear(); } I have no clue what to fill in for the ???'s. Any help is greatly appreciated!

  Read the article

• Make object by it's name

  - by Ockonal

  Hello, is it possible to return exemplar of object using passed type name (string) in c++? I have some base abstract class Base and a few derivates. Example code: class Base { /* ... */ }; class Der1 : public Base { /* ... */ }; class Der2 : public Base { /* ... */ }; And I need function like: Base *objectByType(const std::string &name); Number of derivates classes are changeable and I don't want to make something like switching of name and returning by hands new object type. Is it possible in c++ to do that automatically anyway? p.s. usage should looks like: dynamic_cast<Der1>(objectByType("Der1")); I need pure c++ code (crossplatform). Using boost is permissible.

  Read the article

• What is the difference between these two ways of creating NSStrings?

  - by adame

  NSString *myString = @"Hello"; NSString *myString = [NSString stringWithString:@"Hello"]; I understand that using method (1) creates a pointer to a string literal that is defined as static memory (and cannot be deallocated) and that using (2) creates an NSString object that will be autoreleased. Is using method (1) bad? What are the major differences? Is there any instances where you would want to use (1)? Is there a performance difference? P.S. I have searched extensively on Stack Overflow and while there are questions on the same topic, none of them have answers to the questions I have posted above.

  Read the article

• Question about r-value in C++0x

  - by Goofy

  Rvalues IMHO are great improvement in C++, but at the beginning the're seems quite. Please look at code below: #include <string> std::string && foo (void) { std::string message ("Hello!"); return std::move (message); } void bar (const std::string &message2) { if (message == "Bye Bye!") return; } int main () { bar (foo ()); } Reference message2 is last owner of original message object returned by foo(), right?

  Read the article

• Need guidance for my first Android application: how many activities should I use?

  - by jul

  Hi, I'm starting Android doing an application for searching restaurants, and some guidance would be welcome! On the first screen I'd like to have a search field with a submit button (I get the data from a web service), and below a list with the results of the search. When clicking on one of the items of the list it will show a screen with the restaurant details as well as a map showing its location. My questions are: Can I do everything in one single activity or should I do an activity for the search, one for the result list, one for the restaurant description, and another for the map? Would doing one single activity make the application more responsive? How can I use a list and a map within a normal activity (without ListActivity and MapActivity)? Any help, pointer, example application or sample code is very appreciated! Thank you Jul

  Read the article

• Object reference not set to an instance of an object

  - by Ste

  I have this function that create runtime textbox: int i = 0; private TextBox[] addressBox = new TextBox[100]; private void appendNewTab() { addressBox[i] = new TextBox(); addressBox[i].KeyPress += new KeyPressEventHandler(this.addressBox_KeyPress); i++; } void addressBox_KeyPress(object sender, KeyPressEventArgs e) { if (e.KeyChar == (char)13) { MessageBox.Show(addressBox[i].Text); } } but i have Object reference not set to an instance of an object here MessageBox.Show(addressBox[i].Text); any suggestion?

  Read the article

• C++ Iterators and inheritance

  - by jomnis

  Have a quick question about what would be the best way to implement iterators in the following: Say I have a templated base class 'List' and two subclasses "ListImpl1" and "ListImpl2". The basic requirement of the base class is to be iterable i.e. I can do: for(List<T>::iterator it = list->begin(); it != list->end(); it++){ ... } I also want to allow iterator addition e.g.: for(List<T>::iterator it = list->begin()+5; it != list->end(); it++){ ... } So the problem is that the implementation of the iterator for ListImpl1 will be different to that for ListImpl2. I got around this by using a wrapper ListIterator containing a pointer to a ListIteratorImpl with subclasses ListIteratorImpl2 and ListIteratorImpl2, but it's all getting pretty messy, especially when you need to implement operator+ in the ListIterator. Any thoughts on a better design to get around these issues?

  Read the article

• C++ operator[] syntax.

  - by Lanissum

  Just a quick syntax question. I'm writing a map class (for school). If I define the following operator overload: template<typename Key, typename Val> class Map {... Val* operator[](Key k); What happens when a user writes: Map<int,int> myMap; map[10] = 3; Doing something like that will only overwrite a temporary copy of the [null] pointer at Key k. Is it even possible to do: map[10] = 3; printf("%i\n", map[10]); with the same operator overload?

  Read the article

• Memory allocated with malloc does not persist outside function scope?

  - by PM

  Hi, I'm a bit new to C's malloc function, but from what I know it should store the value in the heap, so you can reference it with a pointer from outside the original scope. I created a test program that is supposed to do this but I keep getting the value 0, after running the program. What am I doing wrong? int f1(int * b) { b = malloc(sizeof(int)); *b = 5; } int main() { int * a; f1(a); printf("%d\n", a); return 0; }

  Read the article

• Another problem with decltype

  - by There is nothing we can do

  template<class IntT, IntT low = IntT(), IntT high = IntT()> struct X { static_assert(std::is_same<decltype(low),decltype(high)>::value,"Different types not allowed");//this should give error if types are different decltype(low) a; decltype(high) b; X():a(decltype(a)()),b(decltype(b)())//WHY THIS DOES NOT COMPILE? { cout << typeid(a).name() << '\n'; cout << typeid(b).name() << '\n'; } }; int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { X<char,1,'a'> x;//this according to static_assert shouldn't compile but it does return 0; } Using VS2010. Please see 3 comments in code above.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321  | Next Page >