Search Results

Search found 17342 results on 694 pages for 'custom draw'.

Page 331/694 | < Previous Page | 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338  | Next Page >

  • Fullscreen texture iPhone OpenGL ES

    - by Ben Reeves
    I'm aware that OpenGL textures on the the iphone are required to be a power of 2, is this true of OpenGL 2.0 as well? If I have an image that is 320 x 480 in size and want to draw it full screen is there any possible way to do this with OpenGL. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Using CreateOrthographicOffCenter in XNA

    - by Jeffrey Kern
    I'm trying to figure out how to draw graphics in XNA, and someone else suggested this. But before I attempt to use this... If I create and use this camera, and set LEFT,TOP to 0 and WIDTH=256 and HEIGHT=240, anything I render to the screen will use these coordinates? So a box with a width and height of 1, if set to 0,0 will take up space from 0,0 to 1,1?

    Read the article

  • SVG via dynamic XML+XSL

    - by Daniel
    This is a bit of a vague notion which I have been running over in my head, and which I am very curious if there is an elegant method of solving. Perhaps it should be taken as a thought experiment. Imagine you have an XML schema with a corresponding XSL transform, which renders the XML as SVG in the browser. The XSL generates SVG with appropriate Javascript handlers that, ultimately, implement editing-like functionality such that properties of the objects or their locations on the SVG canvas can be edited by the user. For instance, an element can be dragged from one location to another. Now, this isn't particularly difficult - the drag/drop example is simply a matter of changing the (x,y) coordinates of the SVG object, or a resize operation would be a simple matter of changing its width or height. But is there an elegant way to have Javascript work on the DOM of the source XML document instead of the rendered SVG? Why, you ask? Well, imagine you have very complex XSL transforms, where the modification of one property results in complex changes to the SVG. You want to maintain simplicity in your Javascript code, but also a simple way to persist the modified XML back to the server. Some possibilities of how this may function: After modification of the source DOM, simply re-run the XSL transform and replace the original. Downside: brute force, potentially expensive operation. Create id/class naming conventions in the source and target XML/SVG so elements can be related back to each other, and do an XSL transform on only a subset of the new DOM. In other words, modify temporary DOM, apply XSL to it, remove changed elements from SVG, and insert the new one. Downside: May not be possible to apply XSL to temporary in-browser DOMs(?). Also, perhaps a bit convoluted or ugly to maintain. I think that it may be possible to come up with a framework that handles the second scenario, but the challenge would be making it lightweight and not heavily tied to the actual XML schema. Any ideas or other possibilities? Or is there maybe an existing method of doing this which I'm not aware of? UPDATE: To clarify, as I mentioned in a comment below, this aids in separating the draw code from the edit code. For a more concrete example of how this is useful, imagine an element which determines how it is drawn dependent on the value of a property of an adjacent element. It's better to condense that logic directly in the draw code instead of also duplicating it in the edit code.

    Read the article

  • C# Drawing 2D objects with events

    - by Keeper
    I need to draw several simple objects (polygons composed by lines and arcs, eventually placed on different layers) inside a form (or any other container) and then handle events like: right click on object zoom pan Is there a library/framework that can handle my need or do I need to create my own?

    Read the article

  • Projection on a plane using a 2*3 matrix

    - by leipäjuusto
    Hello, I can easily draw the projection of a 3D set of points onto the plane with normal vector (1,1,1), by using the matrix (-sqrt(3)/2 sqrt(3)/2 0) (-1/2 -1/2 1). I want to do the same thing, but for a projection onto an arbitrary plane with normal vector (a,b,c) instead of (1,1,1). How to find the matrix? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • C# Graphics without Windows form

    - by teishu
    Hi, Could someone provide an example of drawing graphics without a windows form? I have an app that doesn't have a console window or windows form, but i need to draw some basic graphics (lines and rectangles etc.) Hope that makes sense. Thanks in advance.. J

    Read the article

  • doublebuffering not reducing the flicker

    - by fishhead
    I am drawing an grid-work of objects in a Panel. when I scroll the the panel quickly I get a flicker. I thought that enabling the double buffering may take care of this but what I find is that it does not completely draw everything and I am left with blank sections. could anyone give me suggestions as to what may be happening and how I might correct it. UPDATE: I found that I was creating the graphics object with Creategraphics() rather than using the Parameter in the paint method

    Read the article

  • Is there a programming language with be semantics close to English ?

    - by ivo s
    Most languages allow to 'tweek' to certain extend parts of the syntax (C++,C#) and/or semantics that you will be using in your code (Katahdin, lua). But I have not heard of a language that can just completely define how your code will look like. So isn't there some language which already exists that has such capabilities to override all syntax & define semantics ? Example of what I want to do is basically from the C# code below: foreach(Fruit fruit in Fruits) { if(fruit is Apple) { fruit.Price = fruit.Price/2; } } I want do be able to to write the above code in my perfect language like this: Check if any fruits are Macintosh apples and discount the price by 50%. The advantages that come to my mind looking from a coder's perspective in this "imaginary" language are: It's very clear what is going on (self descriptive) - it's plain English after all even kid would understand my program Hides all complexities which I have to write in C#. But why should I care to learn that if statements, arithmetic operators etc since there are already implemented The disadvantages that I see for a coder who will maintain this program are: Maybe you would express this program differently from me so you may not get all the information that I've expressed in my sentence Programs can be quite verbose and hard to debug but if possible to even proximate this type of syntax above maybe more people would start programming right? That would be amazing I think. I can go to work and just write an essay to draw a square on a winform like this: Create a form called MyGreetingForm. Draw a square with in the middle of MyGreetingFormwith a side of 100 points. In the middle of the square write "Hello! Click here to continue" in Arial font. In the above code the parser must basically guess that I want to use the unnamed square from the previous sentence, it'd be hard to write such a smart parser I guess, yet it's so simple what I want to do. If the user clicks on square in the middle of MyGreetingForm show MyMainForm. In the above code 'basically' the compiler must: 1)generate an event handler 2) check if there is any square in the middle of the form and if there is - 3) hide the form and show another form It looks very hard to do but it doesn't look impossible IMO to me at least approximate this (I can personally generate a parser to perform the 3 steps above np & it's basically the same that it has to do any way when you add even in c# a.MyEvent=+handler; so I don't see a problem here) so I'm thinking maybe somebody already did something like this ? Or is there some practical burden of complexity to create such a 'essay style' programming language which I can't see ? I mean what's the worse that can happen if the parser is not that good? - your program will crash so you have to re-word it:)

    Read the article

  • how to tackle a new project

    - by stevo
    Hi, I have a question about best practice on how to tackle a new project, any project. When starting a new project how do you go about tackling the project, do you split it into sections, start writing code, draw up flow diagrams. I'm asking this question because I'm looking for advice on how I can start new projects so I can get going on them quicker. I can have it planned, designed and starting coding with everything worked out. Any advice? Thanks Stephen

    Read the article

  • Line for signature in markdown

    - by JBarberU
    I'm writing a document using markdown, which I'm exporting to a PDF using pandoc. At the end of the document I need to have space for signatures on a printed copy of the PDF. I've tried to find how to draw a line with a fixed width, but so far I only got to escaping the underscore character, which doesn't feel quite right. It's as if I'm missing something, this couldn't possibly be that unusual to want to do. Any help or pointers are greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Drawing with element array in OpenGL ES

    - by FatalMojo
    Hello! I am trying to use OpenGLES to draw a x by y matrix of squares about an arbitrary point. I have an array sideVertice[] that holds a series of vertex structs defined as such typedef struct { GLfloat x; GLfloat y; GLfloat z; } Vertex3D; and an element array defined as such GLubyte elementArray[]; my draw loop is as such glLoadIdentity(); glVertexPointer(3, GL_FLOAT, 0, cube.sideVertice); for (int i=0; i<((cube.cubeSize + 1)*(cube.cubeSize + 1)); i++) { for (int j=0; j<=3; j++) { elementArray[j] = j + i*4; glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLE_STRIP, 4, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, elementArray); } } for (int i=0; i<=3; i++) elementArray[i] = i; However, the visual output is corrupted and I cannot figure out what the problem is. here is an output of the vertice held in the array: 2010-04-15 23:44:48.816 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[0][0] x:-26.000000 y:1.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.817 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[1][1] x:-26.000000 y:26.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.826 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[2][2] x:-1.000000 y:1.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.829 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[3][3] x:-1.000000 y:26.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.830 RubixGL[4203:20b] Next Face 2010-04-15 23:44:48.830 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[0][4] x:1.000000 y:1.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.832 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[1][5] x:1.000000 y:26.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.837 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[2][6] x:26.000000 y:1.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.838 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[3][7] x:26.000000 y:26.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.848 RubixGL[4203:20b] Next Face 2010-04-15 23:44:48.849 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[0][8] x:-26.000000 y:-26.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.850 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[1][9] x:-26.000000 y:-1.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.851 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[2][10] x:-1.000000 y:-26.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.852 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[3][11] x:-1.000000 y:-1.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.853 RubixGL[4203:20b] Next Face 2010-04-15 23:44:48.853 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[0][12] x:1.000000 y:-26.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.854 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[1][13] x:1.000000 y:-1.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.854 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[2][14] x:26.000000 y:-26.000000 2010-04-15 23:44:48.855 RubixGL[4203:20b] vertex[3][15] x:26.000000 y:-1.000000 any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Generating Bezier Control Points for an object

    - by E.F
    Hello everyone, I'm trying to draw objects using Bezier surfaces with openGL's evaluators. I am struggling with defining the control points for my objects. Can anyone please suggest ways to get the control points for an object? Is there some program that I can use to design my object then import the control points into a file that I can use in my application?

    Read the article

  • UITableViewCell with 'ball' like calendar App

    - by Stuart Tevendale
    in the iPhone Calendar app, the view to select the calendar for a particular event has a coloured circle next to the calendar name, drawn with a graduated/3D effect of a ball. Does anyone have any sample code for how this is drawn - I can draw a solid circle in the UITableViewCell, but I'm not sure how to get the 3D effect. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How do I measure the size of a TextBlock in WPF before it is rendered?

    - by Scott Whitlock
    I have a WPF DataTemplate with two TextBlock controls (stacked) and then some other elements underneath. Due to some complicated layout code, I need to know the height of the two TextBlock elements so that I can draw some fancy connector lines, and line up other controls, etc. If I know the text that's going into the TextBlocks, and I know the font, etc., is there some way I can compute or measure the height of these TextBlocks without actually rendering them?

    Read the article

  • Pretty Pixel-level Picture Painting, Programatically

    - by dreeves
    My mac laptop has 1,024,000 pixels. What's the simplest way to turn my display completely black and go nuts with writing little programs to twiddle pixels to my heart's delight? To make it more concrete, say I wanted to implement the Chaos Game to draw a Sierpinski triangle, at the pixel level, with nothing else on the screen. What are ways to do that?

    Read the article

  • How to read MIDI file in C#?

    - by melculetz
    Do you know any library in C# that I can use in order to read an existing *.mid file? I want to draw the sound frequency graph for the MIDI file, but I cannot get the inner data. I tried using NAudio and Alvas.Audio, but I wans't able to read a MIDI file. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Connection between Properties of Entities in Data Oriented Design

    - by sharethis
    I want to start with an example illustrating my question. The following way it is done in the most games. class car { vec3 position; vec3 rotation; mesh model; imge texture; void move(); // modify position and rotation void draw(); // use model, texture, ... }; vector<car> cars; for(auto i = cars.begin(); i != cars.end(); ++i) { i->move(); i->draw(); } Data oriented design means to process the same calculation on the hole batch of data at once. This way it takes more advantage out of the processor cache. struct movedata { vec3 position; vec3 rotation; }; struct drawdata { mesh model; imge texture; }; vector<movedata> movedatas; vector<drawdata> drawdatas; for(auto i = movedatas.begin(); i != movedatas.end(); ++i) { // modify position and rotation } for(auto i = drawdatas.begin(); i != drawdatas.end(); ++i) { // use model, texture, ... } But there comes a point where you need to find other properties according to an entity. For example if the car crashes, I do not need the drawdata and the movedata any more. So I need to delete the entries of this entity in all vectors. The entries are not linked by code. So my question is the following. How are properties of the same entity conceptually linked in a data oriented design?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338  | Next Page >