Search Results

Search found 14399 results on 576 pages for 'python noob'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 409/576 | < Previous Page | 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416  | Next Page >

  • urllib open - how to control the number of retries

    - by user1641071
    how can i control the number of retries of the "opener.open"? for example, in the following code, it will send about 6 "GET" HTTP requests (i saw it in the Wireshark sniffer) before it goes to the " except urllib.error.URLError" success/no-success lines. password_mgr = urllib.request.HTTPPasswordMgrWithDefaultRealm() password_mgr.add_password(None,url, username, password) handler = urllib.request.HTTPBasicAuthHandler(password_mgr) opener = urllib.request.build_opener(handler) try: resp = opener.open(url,None,1) except urllib.error.URLError as e: print ("no success") else: print ("success!")

    Read the article

  • List filtering: list comprehension vs. lambda + filter

    - by Agos
    I happened to find myself having a basic filtering need: I have a list and I have to filter it by an attribute of the items. My code looked like this: list = [i for i in list if i.attribute == value] But then i thought, wouldn't it be better to write it like this? filter(lambda x: x.attribute == value, list) It's more readable, and if needed for performance the lambda could be taken out to gain something. Question is: are there any caveats in using the second way? Any performance difference? Am I missing the Pythonic Way™ entirely and should do it in yet another way (such as using itemgetter instead of the lambda)? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • get the list and input from one function and run them in different function

    - by rookie
    i have a programm that generate the list and then i ask them to tell me what they want to do from the menu and this is where my problem start i was able to get the input form the user to different function but when i try to use the if else condition it doesn't check, below are my code def menu(x,l): print (x) if x == 1: return make_table(l) if x == 2: y= input("enter a row (as a number) or a column (as an uppercase letter") if y in [ "1",'2','3']: print("Minmum is:",minimum(y,l)) if x== 3: print ('bye') def main(): bad_filename = True l =[] while bad_filename == True: try: filename = input("Enter the filename: ") fp = open(filename, "r") for f_line in fp: f_str=f_line.strip() f_str=f_str.split(',') for unit_str in f_str: unit=float(unit_str) l.append(unit) bad_filename = False except IOError: print("Error: The file was not found: ", filename) #print(l) condition=True while condition==True: print('1- open\n','2- maximum') x=input("Enter the choice") menu(x,l) main() from the bottom function i can get list and i can get the user input and i can get the data and move it in second function but it wont work after that.thank you

    Read the article

  • text overlay for tray icon

    - by AnC
    I have a simple tray icon using PyGTK's gtk.StatusIcon: import pygtk pygtk.require('2.0') import gtk statusIcon = gtk.StatusIcon() statusIcon.set_from_stock(gtk.STOCK_EDIT) statusIcon.set_tooltip('Hello World') statusIcon.set_visible(True) gtk.main() How can I add a text label (one or two characters; basically, unread count) to the tooltip - without creating separate images for set_from_file?

    Read the article

  • Yet another list comprehension question

    - by relima
    I had this: if Setting["Language"] == "en": f.m_radioBox3.SetSelection(0) elif Setting["Language"] == "pt": f.m_radioBox3.SetSelection(1) elif Setting["Language"] == "fr": f.m_radioBox3.SetSelection(2) elif Setting["Language"] == "es": f.m_radioBox3.SetSelection(3) Then I did this: Linguas = ["en","pt","fr","es"] a = 0 for i in Linguas: if i == Setting["Language"]: f.m_radioBox3.SetSelection(a) a += 1 Is it possible to further simplify this and make it into a one-liner?

    Read the article

  • indexing for faster search of lists in a file??

    - by kaushik
    i have a file having around 1 lakh lists and have a another file with again a list of around an average of 50.. I want to compare 2nd item of list in second file with the 2nd element of 1st file and repeat this for each of the 50 lists in 2nd file and get the result of all the matching element. I have written the code for all this,but this is taking a lot of time as it need to check the whole the 1lakh list some 50 times..i want to improve the speed... please tell me how can i do this.... i cant not post my code as it is part of big code and will be difficult to infer anything from that... please tell what can be done to improve the speed?? thank u,

    Read the article

  • does webapp has 'elseif' or 'elif' in template tags..

    - by zjm1126
    my code is : Hello!~~~ {% if user %} <p>Logged in as {{ user.first_name }} {{ user.last_name }}.</p> {% elif openid_user%} <p>Hello, {{openid_user.nickname}}! Do you want to <a href="{{openid_logout_url}}">Log out?</p> {% else %} <p><a href="/login?redirect={{ current_url }}">google Log in</a>.</p> <p><a href="/twitter">twitter Log in</a>.</p> <p><a href="/facebook">facebook Log in</a>.</p> <p><a href="{{openid_login_url}}">openid Log in</a>.</p> <iframe src="/_openid/login?continue=/"></iframe> {% endif %} the error is : TemplateSyntaxError: Invalid block tag: 'elif' does not webapp has a 'else if ' ? thanks

    Read the article

  • efficiently convert string (or tuple) to ctypes array

    - by Mu Mind
    I've got code that takes a PIL image and converts it to a ctypes array to pass out to a C function: w_px, h_px = img.size pixels = struct.unpack('%dI'%(w_px*h_px), img.convert('RGBA').tostring()) pixels_array = (ctypes.c_int * len(pixels))(*pixels) But I'm dealing with big images, and unpacking that many items into function arguments seems to be noticeably slow. What's the simplest thing I can do to get a reasonable speedup? I'm only converting to a tuple as an intermediate step, so if it's unnecessary, all the better.

    Read the article

  • How to differentiate between method and function in a decorator?

    - by defnull
    I want to write a decorator that acts differently depending on whether it is applied to a function or to a method. def some_decorator(func): if the_magic_happens_here(func): # <---- Point of interest print 'Yay, found a method ^_^ (unbound jet)' else: print 'Meh, just an ordinary function :/' return func class MyClass(object): @some_decorator def method(self): pass @some_decorator def function(): pass I tried inspect.ismethod(), inspect.ismethoddescriptor() and inspect.isfunction() but no luck. The problem is that a method actually is neither a bound nor an unbound method but an ordinary function as long as it is accessed from within the class body. What I really want to do is to delay the actions of the decorator to the point the class is actually instantiated because I need the methods to be callable in their instance scope. For this, I want to mark methods with an attribute and later search for these attributes when the .__new__() method of MyClass is called. The classes for which this decorator should work are required to inherit from a class that is under my control. You can use that fact for your solution. In the case of a normal function the delay is not necessary and the decorator should take action immediately. That is why I wand to differentiate these two cases.

    Read the article

  • How to turn this simple 10 digit hex number back into 8 digits?

    - by Babil
    The algorithm to convert input 8 digit hex number into 10 digit are following: Given that the 8 digit number is: '12 34 56 78' x1 = 1 * 16^8 * 2^3 x2 = 2 * 16^7 * 2^2 x3 = 3 * 16^6 * 2^1 x4 = 4 * 16^4 * 2^4 x5 = 5 * 16^3 * 2^3 x6 = 6 * 16^2 * 2^2 x7 = 7 * 16^1 * 2^1 x8 = 8 * 16^0 * 2^0 Final 10 digit hex is: = x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 = '08 86 42 98 E8' The problem is - how to go back to 8 digit hex from a given 10 digit hex (for example: 08 86 42 98 E8 to 12 34 56 78) Some sample input and output are following: input output 11 11 11 11 08 42 10 84 21 22 22 33 33 10 84 21 8C 63 AB CD 12 34 52 D8 D0 88 64 45 78 96 32 21 4E 84 98 62 FF FF FF FF 7B DE F7 BD EF

    Read the article

  • Using adaptive step sizes with scipy.integrate.ode

    - by Mike
    The (brief) documentation for scipy.integrate.ode says that two methods (dopri5 and dop853) have stepsize control and dense output. Looking at the examples and the code itself, I can only see a very simple way to get output from an integrator. Namely, it looks like you just step the integrator forward by some fixed dt, get the function value(s) at that time, and repeat. My problem has pretty variable timescales, so I'd like to just get the values at whatever time steps it needs to evaluate to achieve the required tolerances. That is, early on, things are changing slowly, so the output time steps can be big. But as things get interesting, the output time steps have to be smaller. I don't actually want dense output at equal intervals, I just want the time steps the adaptive function uses.

    Read the article

  • Updating a module level shared dictionary

    - by Vishal
    Hi, A module level dictionary 'd' and is accessed by different threads/requests in a django web application. I need to update 'd' every minute with a new data and the process takes about 5 seconds. What could be best solution where I want the users to get either the old value or the new value of d and nothing in between. I can think of a solution where a temp dictionary is constructed with a new data and assigned to 'd' but not sure how this works! Appreciate your ideas. Thanks

    Read the article

  • index error:list out of range

    - by kaushik
    from string import Template from string import Formatter import pickle f=open("C:/begpython/text2.txt",'r') p='C:/begpython/text2.txt' f1=open("C:/begpython/text3.txt",'w') m=[] i=0 k='a' while k is not '': k=f.readline() mi=k.split(' ') m=m+[mi] i=i+1 print m[1] f1.write(str(m[3])) f1.write(str(m[4])) x=[] j=0 while j<i: k=j-1 l=j+1 if j==0 or j==i: j=j+1 else: xj=[] xj=xj+[j] xj=xj+[m[j][2]] xj=xj+[m[k][2]] xj=xj+[m[l][2]] xj=xj+[p] x=x+[xj] j=j+1 f1.write(','.join(x)) f.close() f1.close() It say line 33,xj=xj+m[l][2] has index error,list out of range please help thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • How to save to two tables using one SQLAlchemy model

    - by Oatman
    I have an SQLAlchemy ORM class, linked to MySQL, which works great at saving the data I need down to the underlying table. However, I would like to also save the identical data to a second archive table. Here's some psudocode to try and explain what I mean my_data = Data() #An ORM Class my_data.name = "foo" #This saves just to the 'data' table session.add(my_data) #This will save it to the identical 'backup_data' table my_data_archive = my_data my_data_archive.__tablename__ = 'backup_data' session.add(my_data_archive) #And commits them both session.commit() Just a heads up, I am not interested in mapping a class to a JOIN, as in: http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/mappers.html#mapping-a-class-against-multiple-tables

    Read the article

  • List comprehension, map, and numpy.vectorize performance

    - by mcstrother
    I have a function foo(i) that takes an integer and takes a significant amount of time to execute. Will there be a significant performance difference between any of the following ways of initializing a: a = [foo(i) for i in xrange(100)] a = map(foo, range(100)) vfoo = numpy.vectorize(foo) a = vfoo(range(100)) (I don't care whether the output is a list or a numpy array.) Is there a better way?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416  | Next Page >