Search Results

Search found 36756 results on 1471 pages for 'mysql real query'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 541/1471 | < Previous Page | 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548  | Next Page >

  • Working with sets of rows in (My)SQL and comparing values

    - by Pep.
    Hello, I am trying to figure out the SQL for doing some relatively simple operations on sets of records in a table but I am stuck. Consider a table with multiple rows per item, all identified by a common key. For example: serial model color XX1 A blue XX2 A blue XX3 A green XX5 B red XX6 B blue XX1 B blue What I would for example want to do is: Assuming that all model A rows must have the same color, find the rows which dont. (for example, XX3 is green). Assuming that a given serial number can only point to a single type of model, find out the rows which that does not occur (for example XX1 points both to A and B) These are all simple logically things to do. To abstract it, I want to know how to group things by using a single key (or combination of keys) and then compare the values of those records. Should I use a join on the same table? should i use some sort of array or similar? thanks for your help

    Read the article

  • Persisting Serializable Objects in Hibernate

    - by VeeArr
    I am attempting to persist objects that contain some large Serializable types. I want Hibernate to automatically generate my DDL (using Hibernate annotations). For the most part, this works, but the default database column type used by Hibernate when persisting these types is tinyblob. Unfortunately, this causes crashes when attempting to persist my class, because these types will not fit within the length of tinyblob. However, if I manually set the type (using @Column(columnDefinition="longblob")), it works fine. Is there any way to make the default binary type longblob instead of tinyblob, so that I don't need to manually specify the @Column annotation on each field?

    Read the article

  • update in codeigniter works but displays an error message

    - by Charmie
    i was just wondering what could be the problem with a working code yet displays an error message such as this: A PHP Error was encountered Severity: Notice Message: Array to string conversion Filename: database/DB_active_rec.php Line Number: 1407 im trying to update fields in my database. I have this code and every tutorial are just the same for batch upload. It works anyway but the thing is it display such an error. this what i have in my model: function update2($data){ $this->db->update_batch('users',$data, "id"); } This what i have in my controller: public function updateValues(){ $this->load->model('get_db'); $newRow = array( array( 'id' => '3', 'firstname' => 'Rapphie' ), array( 'id' => '2', 'firstname' => 'Charmie' ) ); $this->get_db->update2($newRow); echo "it has been updated"; } please help.

    Read the article

  • SQL query doesn't get inserted

    - by Deejdd
    I've been trying to get my query to work for some time it runs but doesn't insert anything nor does it return any errors. The database connection is open and is successfuly connection. The Table is called errorlog and holds the following data - id (int autoincremental, Primary key, Unique) - exception (varchar) - time (DateTime) exception = String(error message) time = DateTime.Now Here's the code: public void insertError(string error, DateTime time) { SqlCeParameter[] sqlParams = new SqlCeParameter[] { new SqlCeParameter("@exception", error), new SqlCeParameter("@time", time) }; try { cmd = new SqlCeCommand(); cmd.Connection = connection; cmd.CommandType = CommandType.Text; cmd.CommandText = "INSERT INTO errorlog (exception, time) VALUES(@exception, @time)"; cmd.Parameters.AddRange(sqlParams); cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); } catch (Exception e) { Console.WriteLine(e.Message); } } Any help would be appreciated, Thanks in advance. EDIT Removed quotes around @exception Heres the connection: protected DataController() { try { string appPath = System.IO.Path.GetDirectoryName(Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(DataController)).CodeBase).Replace(@"file:\", "") + @"\"; string strCon = @"Data Source = " + appPath + @"Data\EasyShop.sdf"; connection = new SqlCeConnection(strCon); } catch (Exception e) { } connection.Open(); } Finally the way it gets called: public bool log(string msg, bool timestamp = true) { DataController dc = DataController.Instance(); dc.insertError(msg, DateTime.Today); return true; }

    Read the article

  • Update all but one result?

    - by Jack M.
    I'm trying to update a table to remove all but the first instance of a group. Basically, I have a table with vehicle data related to an insurance policy. Each policy should only have one power_unit. Everything else should be a towed unit. Unfortunately, a bug has been duplicating power units, and now I need to clean this up. There are ~10k records in the database, and ~4k of them have doubled up power units. The important bits of my table (call it test1 for now) are: +------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | id | int(10) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | policy_id | int(10) | NO | | NULL | | | power_unit | int(1) | NO | | 0 | | +------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ And some sample data: +----+-----------+------------+ | id | policy_id | power_unit | +----+-----------+------------+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | 1 | | 4 | 2 | 1 | | 5 | 2 | 1 | | 6 | 2 | 1 | | 7 | 4 | 1 | | 8 | 4 | 1 | | 9 | 4 | 1 | | 10 | 5 | 1 | | 11 | 5 | 1 | | 12 | 6 | 1 | +----+-----------+------------+ Basically I'd like to end up where policy_id 1 has only one power_unit=1. Same for policy_id 2, 3, 4, etc. For policy_id 6, nothing should change (there is only one entry, and it is a power_unit already). I don't know if this is possible, but it was an intriguing problem for me, so I thought you guys might find it the same.

    Read the article

  • connection textfield and html table with database

    - by klox
    dear all..i have a textfield <tr> <td> <td><input type="text" id="mod"></td> </td> </tr> and a cell <tr> <td><div id="value">//i want data show here</div> </td> </tr> beside that, i've a table "settingdata" in database it consist of 2 field:itemdata and remark.. itemdata's value are "UD" and remark's value are "FM=87.5-108.0MHZ"... what must i do if i want after type "0103UD" at textfield inside <div id="value"></div> can show "FM=87.5-108.0mhz"...

    Read the article

  • Online Hotel Booking System, Simultaneous Booking?

    - by KiiroSora09
    I'm asked to create an online booking system with online payment and I'm wondering what to do in the case when 2 customers booked for the same room(s) at the same time. For Example: At the same time: Customer1 and Customer2 booked for a standard room which only has 1 room available. (The Room availability will display that there is still 1 room available). And then they hit the 'confirm' button at the same time.

    Read the article

  • Joining two mysql_fetch_arrays

    - by John Harbert
    I am trying to piece two queries together. Below is the code Im using. However the table is splitting up the data. How can I remedy this? Or what better solutions are there? while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { echo "<tr id='centered' >"; echo "<td class='leftalign'>" . $row['Quarter_Name'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['Quarterly_yield'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['Quarterly_yield'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['Quarterly_yield'] . "</td>"; } while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result8)) { echo "<td>" . $row['Quarterly_yield'] . "</td>"; }

    Read the article

  • Executing multiple update statements in PHP

    - by theband
    I have three update statements to be executed in PHP, i am getting the values of all these as return parameters. How to execute each statement independely and finally show the end user the result that it has been successfully updated. <?php public function name($parameter1,$parameter2.... $parametern) { $records=array(); $sql=""; $sql2=""; $sql3=""; $result=mysql_query($sql); //return $result; if(!$result){throw new Exception(mysql_error());} if(mysql_num_rows($result)==0){return $records;} while($row=mysql_fetch_assoc($result)){$records[]=$row;} return $records; } ?> Then how finally we can get the result in my row object.

    Read the article

  • Sphinx without using an auto_increment id

    - by squeeks
    I am current in planning on creating a big database (2+ million rows) with a variety of data from separate sources. I would like to avoid structuring the database around auto_increment ids to help prevent against sync issues with replication, and also because each item inserted will have a alphanumeric product code that is guaranteed to be unique - it seems to me more sense to use that instead. I am looking at a search engine to index this database with Sphinx looking rather appealing due to its design around indexing relational databases. However, looking at various tutorials and documentation seems to show database designs being dependent on an auto_increment field in one form or another and a rather bold statement in the documentation saying that document ids must be 32/64bit integers only or things break. Is there a way to have a database indexed by Sphinx without auto_increment fields as the id?

    Read the article

  • Where to store users visited pages?

    - by kofto4ka
    Hi there. I have a project, where I have posts for example. The task is next: I must show to user his last posts visit. This is my solution: every time user visits new (for him) topic, I create a new record in table visits. Table visits has next structure: id, user_id, post_id, last_visit. Now my tables visits has ~14,000,000 records and its still growing every day.. May be my solution isnt optimal and exists another way how to store users visits? Its important to save every visit as standalone record, because I also have feature to select and use users visits. And I cant purge this table, because data could be needed later month, year. How I could optimize this situation?

    Read the article

  • mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in

    - by user2533440
    I cannot figure out whats wrong with this code. Every time i try to run this file I get error mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource <?php $q = "select * from tbfood"; $rs = mysql_query($q); while($msg = mysql_fetch_assoc($rs)){ echo "<p>".$msg["name"]."</p>"; echo "<p>".$msg["price"]."</p>"; if ($msg['idDruh'] == 1) { echo "string1"; } elseif ($msg['idDruh'] == 2) { echo "string2"; } elseif ($msg['idDruh'] == 3) { echo "string3"; } elseif ($msg['idDruh'] == 4) { echo "string4"; } elseif ($msg['idDruh'] == 5) { echo "string5"; } elseif ($msg['idDruh'] == 6) { echo "string6"; } elseif ($msg['idDruh'] == 7) { echo "string7"; } } ?>

    Read the article

  • Best way to update record X when Y is inserted

    - by Saif Bechan
    I have a huge table that is mainly used for backup and administrative purposes. The only records that matters is the last inserted record. On every hit to order by time inserted is just too slow. I want keep a separate table with the last inserted id. In PHP I now insert, get last inserted id, and update the other table. Is there a more efficient way to do this.

    Read the article

  • Strange SQL problem selecting multiple values for same column

    - by Nubber
    Hello there, Been at this for a few hours now and I can't make any sense of it. I've used this way of selecting multiple values for same column a few times, but there is something weird with this one. SELECT * FROM employee as s INNER JOIN works AS w1 ON w1.name = s.name INNER JOIN employee AS w2 ON w2.name = s.name INNER JOIN employee AS w3 ON w3.name = s.name WHERE w2.city = 'Washington' Basically what I want to do is find all companies which have people in all the cities. The company name is under 'works'. The problem is however that if I have the WHERE w2.city='Washington' it will make ALL the cities match Washington when it should only touch w2 and leave w3 alone so I could match it with another value. Anyone know why its doing this? Or know a better way to do it. Thank you very much in advance.

    Read the article

  • what does this ADO OPEN Method do?

    - by every_answer_gets_a_point
    in plain english can you explain to me what happens here: rs.Open "batchinfo", oConn, adOpenKeyset, adLockOptimistic, adCmdTable what i need to do is to be able to insert values into a table called batchinfo. would this be the best way to do an OPEN? the only thing i would be doing is inserting values.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548  | Next Page >