Using an alternate JSON Serializer in ASP.NET Web API
- by Rick Strahl
The new ASP.NET Web API that Microsoft released alongside MVC 4.0 Beta last week is a great framework for building REST and AJAX APIs. I've been working with it for quite a while now and I really like the way it works and the complete set of features it provides 'in the box'. It's about time that Microsoft gets a decent API for building generic HTTP endpoints into the framework. DataContractJsonSerializer sucks As nice as Web API's overall design is one thing still sucks: The built-in JSON Serialization uses the DataContractJsonSerializer which is just too limiting for many scenarios. The biggest issues I have with it are: No support for untyped values (object, dynamic, Anonymous Types) MS AJAX style Date Formatting Ugly serialization formats for types like Dictionaries To me the most serious issue is dealing with serialization of untyped objects. I have number of applications with AJAX front ends that dynamically reformat data from business objects to fit a specific message format that certain UI components require. The most common scenario I have there are IEnumerable query results from a database with fields from the result set rearranged to fit the sometimes unconventional formats required for the UI components (like jqGrid for example). Creating custom types to fit these messages seems like overkill and projections using Linq makes this much easier to code up. Alas DataContractJsonSerializer doesn't support it. Neither does DataContractSerializer for XML output for that matter. What this means is that you can't do stuff like this in Web API out of the box:public object GetAnonymousType()
{
return new { name = "Rick", company = "West Wind", entered= DateTime.Now };
}
Basically anything that doesn't have an explicit type DataContractJsonSerializer will not let you return. FWIW, the same is true for XmlSerializer which also doesn't work with non-typed values for serialization. The example above is obviously contrived with a hardcoded object graph, but it's not uncommon to get dynamic values returned from queries that have anonymous types for their result projections.
Apparently there's a good possibility that Microsoft will ship Json.NET as part of Web API RTM release. Scott Hanselman confirmed this as a footnote in his JSON Dates post a few days ago. I've heard several other people from Microsoft confirm that Json.NET will be included and be the default JSON serializer, but no details yet in what capacity it will show up. Let's hope it ends up as the default in the box. Meanwhile this post will show you how you can use it today with the beta and get JSON that matches what you should see in the RTM version.
What about JsonValue?
To be fair Web API DOES include a new JsonValue/JsonObject/JsonArray type that allow you to address some of these scenarios. JsonValue is a new type in the System.Json assembly that can be used to build up an object graph based on a dictionary. It's actually a really cool implementation of a dynamic type that allows you to create an object graph and spit it out to JSON without having to create .NET type first. JsonValue can also receive a JSON string and parse it without having to actually load it into a .NET type (which is something that's been missing in the core framework). This is really useful if you get a JSON result from an arbitrary service and you don't want to explicitly create a mapping type for the data returned.
For serialization you can create an object structure on the fly and pass it back as part of an Web API action method like this:public JsonValue GetJsonValue()
{
dynamic json = new JsonObject();
json.name = "Rick";
json.company = "West Wind";
json.entered = DateTime.Now;
dynamic address = new JsonObject();
address.street = "32 Kaiea";
address.zip = "96779";
json.address = address;
dynamic phones = new JsonArray();
json.phoneNumbers = phones;
dynamic phone = new JsonObject();
phone.type = "Home";
phone.number = "808 123-1233";
phones.Add(phone);
phone = new JsonObject();
phone.type = "Home";
phone.number = "808 123-1233";
phones.Add(phone);
//var jsonString = json.ToString();
return json;
}
which produces the following output (formatted here for easier reading):{
name: "rick",
company: "West Wind",
entered: "2012-03-08T15:33:19.673-10:00",
address:
{
street: "32 Kaiea",
zip: "96779"
},
phoneNumbers: [
{
type: "Home",
number: "808 123-1233"
},
{
type: "Mobile",
number: "808 123-1234"
}]
}
If you need to build a simple JSON type on the fly these types work great. But if you have an existing type - or worse a query result/list that's already formatted JsonValue et al. become a pain to work with. As far as I can see there's no way to just throw an object instance at JsonValue and have it convert into JsonValue dictionary. It's a manual process.
Using alternate Serializers in Web API
So, currently the default serializer in WebAPI is DataContractJsonSeriaizer and I don't like it. You may not either, but luckily you can swap the serializer fairly easily. If you'd rather use the JavaScriptSerializer built into System.Web.Extensions or Json.NET today, it's not too difficult to create a custom MediaTypeFormatter that uses these serializers and can replace or partially replace the native serializer.
Here's a MediaTypeFormatter implementation using the ASP.NET JavaScriptSerializer:using System;
using System.Net.Http.Formatting;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Web.Script.Serialization;
using System.Json;
using System.IO;
namespace Westwind.Web.WebApi
{
public class JavaScriptSerializerFormatter : MediaTypeFormatter
{
public JavaScriptSerializerFormatter()
{
SupportedMediaTypes.Add(new System.Net.Http.Headers.MediaTypeHeaderValue("application/json"));
}
protected override bool CanWriteType(Type type)
{
// don't serialize JsonValue structure use default for that
if (type == typeof(JsonValue) || type == typeof(JsonObject) || type== typeof(JsonArray) )
return false;
return true;
}
protected override bool CanReadType(Type type)
{
if (type == typeof(IKeyValueModel))
return false;
return true;
}
protected override System.Threading.Tasks.Taskobject OnReadFromStreamAsync(Type type, System.IO.Stream stream, System.Net.Http.Headers.HttpContentHeaders contentHeaders, FormatterContext formatterContext)
{
var task = Taskobject.Factory.StartNew(() =
{
var ser = new JavaScriptSerializer();
string json;
using (var sr = new StreamReader(stream))
{
json = sr.ReadToEnd();
sr.Close();
}
object val = ser.Deserialize(json,type);
return val;
});
return task;
}
protected override System.Threading.Tasks.Task OnWriteToStreamAsync(Type type, object value, System.IO.Stream stream, System.Net.Http.Headers.HttpContentHeaders contentHeaders, FormatterContext formatterContext, System.Net.TransportContext transportContext)
{
var task = Task.Factory.StartNew( () =
{
var ser = new JavaScriptSerializer();
var json = ser.Serialize(value);
byte[] buf = System.Text.Encoding.Default.GetBytes(json);
stream.Write(buf,0,buf.Length);
stream.Flush();
});
return task;
}
}
}
Formatter implementation is pretty simple: You override 4 methods to tell which types you can handle and then handle the input or output streams to create/parse the JSON data.
Note that when creating output you want to take care to still allow JsonValue/JsonObject/JsonArray types to be handled by the default serializer so those objects serialize properly - if you let either JavaScriptSerializer or JSON.NET handle them they'd try to render the dictionaries which is very undesirable.
If you'd rather use Json.NET here's the JSON.NET version of the formatter:// this code requires a reference to JSON.NET in your project
#if true
using System;
using System.Net.Http.Formatting;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Web.Script.Serialization;
using System.Json;
using Newtonsoft.Json;
using System.IO;
using Newtonsoft.Json.Converters;
namespace Westwind.Web.WebApi
{
public class JsonNetFormatter : MediaTypeFormatter
{
public JsonNetFormatter()
{
SupportedMediaTypes.Add(new System.Net.Http.Headers.MediaTypeHeaderValue("application/json"));
}
protected override bool CanWriteType(Type type)
{
// don't serialize JsonValue structure use default for that
if (type == typeof(JsonValue) || type == typeof(JsonObject) || type == typeof(JsonArray))
return false;
return true;
}
protected override bool CanReadType(Type type)
{
if (type == typeof(IKeyValueModel))
return false;
return true;
}
protected override System.Threading.Tasks.Taskobject OnReadFromStreamAsync(Type type, System.IO.Stream stream, System.Net.Http.Headers.HttpContentHeaders contentHeaders, FormatterContext formatterContext)
{
var task = Taskobject.Factory.StartNew(() =
{
var settings = new JsonSerializerSettings()
{
NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore,
};
var sr = new StreamReader(stream);
var jreader = new JsonTextReader(sr);
var ser = new JsonSerializer();
ser.Converters.Add(new IsoDateTimeConverter());
object val = ser.Deserialize(jreader, type);
return val;
});
return task;
}
protected override System.Threading.Tasks.Task OnWriteToStreamAsync(Type type, object value, System.IO.Stream stream, System.Net.Http.Headers.HttpContentHeaders contentHeaders, FormatterContext formatterContext, System.Net.TransportContext transportContext)
{
var task = Task.Factory.StartNew( () =
{
var settings = new JsonSerializerSettings()
{
NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore,
};
string json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(value, Formatting.Indented,
new JsonConverter[1] { new IsoDateTimeConverter() } );
byte[] buf = System.Text.Encoding.Default.GetBytes(json);
stream.Write(buf,0,buf.Length);
stream.Flush();
});
return task;
}
}
}
#endif
One advantage of the Json.NET serializer is that you can specify a few options on how things are formatted and handled. You get null value handling and you can plug in the IsoDateTimeConverter which is nice to product proper ISO dates that I would expect any Json serializer to output these days.
Hooking up the Formatters
Once you've created the custom formatters you need to enable them for your Web API application. To do this use the GlobalConfiguration.Configuration object and add the formatter to the Formatters collection. Here's what this looks like hooked up from Application_Start in a Web project:protected void Application_Start(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Action based routing (used for RPC calls)
RouteTable.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "StockApi",
routeTemplate: "stocks/{action}/{symbol}",
defaults: new
{
symbol = RouteParameter.Optional,
controller = "StockApi"
}
);
// WebApi Configuration to hook up formatters and message handlers
// optional
RegisterApis(GlobalConfiguration.Configuration);
}
public static void RegisterApis(HttpConfiguration config)
{
// Add JavaScriptSerializer formatter instead - add at top to make default
//config.Formatters.Insert(0, new JavaScriptSerializerFormatter());
// Add Json.net formatter - add at the top so it fires first!
// This leaves the old one in place so JsonValue/JsonObject/JsonArray still are handled
config.Formatters.Insert(0, new JsonNetFormatter());
}
One thing to remember here is the GlobalConfiguration object which is Web API's static configuration instance. I think this thing is seriously misnamed given that GlobalConfiguration could stand for anything and so is hard to discover if you don't know what you're looking for. How about WebApiConfiguration or something more descriptive? Anyway, once you know what it is you can use the Formatters collection to insert your custom formatter.
Note that I insert my formatter at the top of the list so it takes precedence over the default formatter. I also am not removing the old formatter because I still want JsonValue/JsonObject/JsonArray to be handled by the default serialization mechanism. Since they process in sequence and I exclude processing for these types JsonValue et al. still get properly serialized/deserialized.
Summary
Currently DataContractJsonSerializer in Web API is a pain, but at least we have the ability with relatively limited effort to replace the MediaTypeFormatter and plug in our own JSON serializer. This is useful for many scenarios - if you have existing client applications that used MVC JsonResult or ASP.NET AJAX results from ASMX AJAX services you can plug in the JavaScript serializer and get exactly the same serializer you used in the past so your results will be the same and don't potentially break clients. JSON serializers do vary a bit in how they serialize some of the more complex types (like Dictionaries and dates for example) and so if you're migrating it might be helpful to ensure your client code doesn't break when you switch to ASP.NET Web API.
Going forward it looks like Microsoft is planning on plugging in Json.Net into Web API and make that the default. I think that's an awesome choice since Json.net has been around forever, is fast and easy to use and provides a ton of functionality as part of this great library. I just wish Microsoft would have figured this out sooner instead of now at the last minute integrating with it especially given that Json.Net has a similar set of lower level JSON objects JsonValue/JsonObject etc. which now will end up being duplicated by the native System.Json stuff. It's not like we don't already have enough confusion regarding which JSON serializer to use (JavaScriptSerializer, DataContractJsonSerializer, JsonValue/JsonObject/JsonArray and now Json.net). For years I've been using my own JSON serializer because the built in choices are both limited. However, with an official encorsement of Json.Net I'm happily moving on to use that in my applications.
Let's see and hope Microsoft gets this right before ASP.NET Web API goes gold.© Rick Strahl, West Wind Technologies, 2005-2012Posted in Web Api AJAX ASP.NET
Tweet
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");
(function() {
var po = document.createElement('script'); po.type = 'text/javascript'; po.async = true;
po.src = 'https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js';
var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s);
})();
