Search Results

Search found 31578 results on 1264 pages for 'javascript functions'.

Page 521/1264 | < Previous Page | 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528  | Next Page >

  • regex partial match for several different groups

    - by koral
    I need regexp to match string build from several groups (A is any letter, 9 is any digit): group 1 regex [A-Z]{1,2}[0-9]? A A9 AA9 group 2 regex [A-Z]{1,3}[0-9]? A AA AAA AAA9 group 3 regex [A-Z]{2,3}[0-9]?[A-Z]? AAA AA9 AA9A group 4 regex [0-9]{1,2}[A-Z]{1,2}[0-9]? 9A 9AA 9A9 99A9 Not each group must be present but there must be all in correct order - I mean (digit is group number): 1 12 123 1234 So if there is present group 3 there must me all preceding groups present also. As there are four groups (can be more), so alternative like ^[A-Z]{1,2}[0-9]{1}|[A-Z]{1,2}[0-9]{1}\s{1}[A-Z]{1}[0-9]?$ is not the best option as it would be complicated and difficult to maintain. Is there any solution with groups or something? The order of groups is important.

    Read the article

  • Problem setting focus to validationsummary control after validation

    - by Ed
    Hi, I have a validationsummary control which displays the summary of a few validationrequired controls and all of them belong to a validationgroup. My submit button also has the same validationgroup so it validates everything upon it being clicked. The problem i am having is setting the focus to the validationsummary control after validation occurs when my submit button is clicked. The focus goes to the top of my webform. I need the focus to be put at the validationsummary control. How do i achieve this? FYI:SetFocusOnError="true" did not work. Thanks for reading.

    Read the article

  • Dashcode newbie question: Change a button's label programmatically

    - by Koning Baard XIV
    Hi all! I'm new to Mac OS X Dashboard developement. Now, I have a button with id b_start. When that button is clicked, I want the label of the button to change to "Round". Now I have tried these, but none of them work: document.getElementById("b_start").label = "Round"; document.getElementById("b_start").text = "Round"; document.getElementById("b_start").innerText = "Round"; document.getElementById("b_start").object.setValue("Round"); document.getElementById("b_start").value = "Round"; Does anyone how I can change the button's label? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Display: Custom Control

    - by pipelinecache
    Hi folks, I've made a simple custom control: base.Style[HtmlTextWriterStyle.Position] = "absolute"; if (this.Expanded) // If the Calendar is expanded. this.Style[HtmlTextWriterStyle.Display] = "block"; else this.Style[HtmlTextWriterStyle.Display] = "none"; //create the containing table Panel pnl = new Panel(); pnl.ID = "pnl_" + this.ClientID; pnl.Enabled = true; SherlockIIITextBox txtCalendar = new SherlockIIITextBox(); txtCalendar.ID = "Cal_" + this.ClientID; pnl.Controls.Add(txtCalendar); ImageButton imgButton = new ImageButton(); imgButton.ImageUrl = ""; imgButton.ID = "img_" + this.ClientID; imgButton.BorderStyle = BorderStyle.NotSet; imgButton.OnClientClick = "o = document.getElementById('" + this.ClientID + "');if (o.style.display=='none'){o.style.display='block';}else{o.style.display='none';}"; pnl.Controls.Add(imgButton); pnl.RenderControl(writer); When I click the ImageButton it should render the calendar. But when I click the ImageButton nothing happens. Anyone got an idea?

    Read the article

  • jQuery UI Dialog and Textarea Focus Issue

    - by Gimli
    I'm working on a modal comment system using jQuery and jQuery UI, but I'm having some issues with focus. I have a series of divs inside the modal to switch between Login and Add comment, as below: <div id="modal" title="Loading"> <div id="modalContent"></div> <div id="modalLogin"> <div class="loginBox"></div> <div class="addCommentBox"></div> <div class="commentReview"></div> </div> </div> Inside of the addCommentBox div, I've got the comment code: <form action="/comments/add" class="addCommentForm" name="addCommentForm" method="post"> <textarea name="content" class="addCommentContent"></textarea> <button value="Add Comment" type="submit" class="commentPost"/> <button value="Clear Comment" type="submit" id="clearComment"/> </form> The issue is that about half the time after opening the dialog the textarea inside the addCommentBox div doesn't react to keyboard inputs when selected. The mouse works correctly and will allow text to be selected, but keyboard control does nothing. I have no event listeners on the textarea. I've got some on the buttons, but they are targeting only the buttons. The only thing that happens in the HTML seems to be the fact that every time I click on the modal, the z-index increases for the overall modal div. I have set the addCommentBox div to have a z-index of 9999, greater than the z-index of the modal. Any suggestions or directions to research would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Hype Machine Fluid Greasemonkey script broken help fixing it.

    - by newhen
    Hi, There is a greasemonkey script here that is suppose to work with a standalone fluid app. I just tried it out and it doesn't but I can't figure out what is wrong with it. Anybody wanna take a look at the code for me see if I am doing something wrong. Alot to ask but worth trying. Source: http://userscripts.org/scripts/review/62762 Screenshot fluid while the script is enabled: http://grab.by/4CoZ (there is no difference in the site at all)

    Read the article

  • onchange force page submit

    - by cometta
    <form jwcid="@Form" listener="listener:updateStaff"> <select jwcid="staffselect@Select" multiple="ognl:false" validators="validators:required" onchange="this.form.submit()" listener="listener:updateStaff"> <span jwcid="@For" source="ognl:hrStaff" value="ognl:currentHrStaff" index="ognl:currentHrStaffIndex"> <option class="text11" jwcid="@Option" selected="ognl:hrStaffSelection[currentHrStaffIndex]" label="ognl:currentHrStaff"/> </span> </select> </form> when onchange on selectbox, this form will be submitted and my pageValidate() will be called follow by upadteStaff() listener method. I wonder, when such submission is fired, can onchange='' pass a flag ('selectboxisfired' string) that i able to capture inside pagevalidate() 'selectboxisfired'? this will allow my logic inside pagevalidate to indicate is triggered by selectbox.

    Read the article

  • ScrollTo - toggle between min-height/fixed height

    - by Skoder
    Hi everyone, I'm trying to use the ScrollTo plugin, but I can't seem to get it working properly. I tried to view the source at the site I linked to but I'm trying to achieve something slightly different. I would like the window pane to change size according to the content (so the height would increase for longer text and would decrease for shorter text). However, when I supply a min-height (as opposed to a fixed height), the pane automatically changes to the maximum height when the page is loaded. So if I have something set to margin-top:1000px;, the pane will be 1000px in size regardless of what tab is currently displaying. The fix would be to use height instead, but that would mean that the window won't expand in height and the user would have to scroll. I got my code from viewing the source on the ScrollTo page, but I also tried this tutorial code. Thanks for any help

    Read the article

  • jQuery plugin options: required, optional, inaccessible

    - by Trevor Hartman
    I'm curious how to specify options to a jQuery plugin in a way that some are required, some are optionally overridden, and some can't be touched. I started off with the usual: jQuery.fn.plugin = function (options){ var defaults = { username: "", posts:10, api: "http://myapi.com" } var settings = jQuery.extend({}, defaults, options); } Let's say I want username to be required, posts is optional (defaults to 10) and you (you being the user of the plugin) can't change api, even if they try. Ideally, they'd all still be in the same data structure instead of being split into separate objects. Ideas?

    Read the article

  • mootools many buttons with one function to handle

    - by Roby
    i want to create a button list like <form id="form"> <input type="button" value="skip"> <input type="button" value="continue"> <input type="button" value="bla"> <input type="button" value="blubb"> </form> and want to post this via a request to a php script witch should get somethink like button "skip" was clicked. but i dont want to make a function for every button. one function for all button. i think it should work with the mootools relay function. $('form').addEvent('click:relay(type=button)', function(){ alert(this.value); }); or somethink like this ? :-/ hopefully someone could help me

    Read the article

  • Display multiple new windows

    - by Ricardo Deano
    Afternoon all. I have the following scenario: I have a search page where by a client searches for a product from a drop down list, upon clicking a button, a gridview is produced display the spec. What I would like is the functionality for the user to make their selection and a new window pops up with the spec. So I have a simple code behind for the search page: protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { Session["Product"] = DropDownList1.SelectedValue; string strScript = "window.open('GridViewPage.aspx', 'Key', 'height=500,width=800,toolbar=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,titlebar=no');"; ScriptManager.RegisterStartupScript(this, typeof(string), "", strScript, true); } And a gridviewpage that presents the data based upon the session created in the search page: <asp:GridView ID="GridView2" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="False" DataSourceID="LinqDataSource1"> <Columns> <asp:BoundField DataField="Product" HeaderText="MemberID" SortExpression="MemberID" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="Spec" HeaderText="Spec" SortExpression="Spec" /> </Columns> </asp:GridView> <asp:LinqDataSource ID="LinqDataSource1" runat="server" ContextTypeName="GridViewInNewWindow.ProductDataContext" EntityTypeName="" TableName="tblProducts" Where="Product == @Product"> <WhereParameters> <asp:SessionParameter Name="Product" SessionField="Product" Type="String" /> </WhereParameters> </asp:LinqDataSource> Now upon first iteration, this does the job...gridview presented in new window...hurrah! i.e. a user searches for egg, the spec for an egg is presented in a new window. However, what I would like to happen is that the user can make multiple searches so a number of new windows are opened. i.e. a user searches for egg once, the spec is returned in a new window; they then wish to see the spec for a chicken, so they use the search page to find said chicken, click the button and another new window is shown displaying the chicken's specs. Does anyone know how I can achieve this? Apologies if this is simple stuff, I am just finding my feet.

    Read the article

  • How to create nested directories in PhoneGap

    - by Stallman
    I have tried on this, but this didn't satisfy my request at all. I write a new one: var file_system; var fs_root; window.requestFileSystem(LocalFileSystem.PERSISTENT, 1024*1024, onInitFs, request_FS_fail); function onInitFs(fs) { file_system= fs; fs_root= file_system.root; alert("ini fs"); create_Directory(); alert("ini fs done."); } var string_array; var main_dir= "story_repository/"+ User_Editime; string_array= new Array("story_repository/",main_dir, main_dir+"/rec", main_dir+"/img","story_repository/"+ User_Name ); function create_Directory(){ var start= 0; var path=""; while(start < string_array.length) { path = string_array[start]; alert(start+" th created directory " +" is "+ path); fs_root.getDirectory ( path , {create: true, exclusive: false}, function(entry) { alert(path +"is created."); }, create_dir_err() ); start++; }//while loop }//create_Directory function create_dir_err() { alert("Recursively create directories error."); } function request_FS_fail() { alert("Failed to request File System "); } Although the directories are created, the it sends me ErrorCallback:"alert("Recursively create directories error.");" Firstly, I don't think this code will work since I have tried on this: This one failed: window.requestFileSystem( LocalFileSystem.PERSISTENT, 0, //request file system success callback. function(fileSys) { fileSys.root.getDirectory( "story_repository/"+ dir_name, {create: true, exclusive: false}, //Create directory story_repository/Stallman_time. function(directory) { alert("Create directory: "+ "story_repository/"+ dir_name); //create dir_name/img/ fileSys.root.getDirectory { "story_repository/"+ dir_name + "/img/", {create: true, exclusive: false}, function(directory) { alert("Create a directory: "+ "story_repository/"+ dir_name + "/img/"); //check. //create dir_name/rec/ fileSys.root.getDirectory { "story_repository/"+ dir_name + "/rec/", {create: true, exclusive: false}, function(directory) { alert("Create a directory: "+ "story_repository/"+ dir_name + "/rec/"); //check. //Go ahead. }, createError } //create dir_name/rec/ }, createError } //create dir_name/img }, createError); }, //Create directory story_repository/Stallman_time. createError()); } I just repeatedly call fs.root.getDirectory only but it failed. But the first one is almost the same... 1. What is the problem at all? Why does the first one always gives me the ErrorCallback? 2. Why can't the second one work? 3. Does anyone has a better solution?(no ErrorcallBack msg) ps: I work on Android and PhoneGap 1.7.0.

    Read the article

  • innter.HTML not working after submit button is clicked

    - by user1781453
    I am trying to get the innerHTML to change to what is in the end of the function "calculate" but nothing happens once I hit submit. Here is my code: Pizza Order Form .outp {border-style:solid;background-color:white; border-color:red;padding:1em; border-width: .5em;} .notes {font-size:smaller;font-style:italic;} p {margin-left: 15%; width: 65%;} textarea {resize : none;} </style> function calculate(){ var type; var newline=""; var sum=0; var toppings=""; if( document.getElementById("small").checked==true){ type="Small Pizza"; sum+=4; } if( document.getElementById("medium").checked==true){ type="Medium Pizza"; sum+=6; } if( document.getElementById("large").checked==true){ type="Large Pizza"; sum+=8; } if( document.getElementById("pepperoni").checked==true){ toppings=toppings+"pepperoni, "; sum+=0.75; } if( document.getElementById("olives").checked==true){ toppings=toppings+"olives, "; sum+=0.6; } if( document.getElementById("sausage").checked==true){ toppings=toppings+"sausage, "; sum+=0.75; } if( document.getElementById("peppers").checked==true){ toppings=toppings+"peppers, "; sum+=0.5; } if( document.getElementById("onions").checked==true){ toppings=toppings+"onions, "; sum+=0.5; } if( document.getElementById("cheese").checked==true){ toppings=toppings+"Cheese Only, "; } var length = toppings.length; toppings = toppings.slice(0,length-2); document.getElementById("opta").innerHTML = type+newline+"Toppings:"+newline+toppings+newline+"Price - $"+sum; } Joe's Pizza Palace On-line Order Form <p id = "op" class = "outp" > <b /> Select the size Pizza you want: &nbsp;&nbsp; <input type="radio" name = "size" id="small" value = "small"> Small - $4.00 <b /> <input type="radio" name = "size" id="medium" value = "medium"> Medium - $6.00 <b /> <input type="radio" name = "size" id="large" value = "large"> Large - $8.00 <b /> </p> <p id = "op1" class = "outp" > <b /> Select the toppings: &nbsp;&nbsp; <input type="checkbox" name = "size" id="pepperoni" value = "pepperoni"> Pepperoni ($0.75) <b /> <input type="checkbox" name = "size" id="olives" value = "olives"> Olives ($0.60) <b /> <input type="checkbox" name = "size" id="sausage" value = "sausage"> Sausage ($0.75) <b /> <br /> <input type="checkbox" name = "size" id="peppers" value = "peppers"> Peppers ($0.50) <b /> <input type="checkbox" name = "size" id="onions" value = "onions"> Onions ($0.50) <b /> <input type="checkbox" name = "size" id="cheese" value = "cheese"> Cheese Only <b /> To obtain the price of your order click on the price button below: <br /><br /> <input type="button" align = "left" onclick="calculate();" value="Price (Submit Button)"/> <input type="reset" align = "left" value="Clear Form"/> <br /><br /> <textarea class="outp3" id="opta" style="border-color:black;" rows="6" cols="40" > </textarea>

    Read the article

  • C++ vs. C++/CLI: Const qualification of virtual function parameters

    - by James McNellis
    [All of the following was tested using Visual Studio 2008 SP1] In C++, const qualification of parameter types does not affect the type of a function (8.3.5/3: "Any cv-qualifier modifying a parameter type is deleted") So, for example, in the following class hierarchy, Derived::Foo overrides Base::Foo: struct Base { virtual void Foo(const int i) { } }; struct Derived : Base { virtual void Foo(int i) { } }; Consider a similar hierarchy in C++/CLI: ref class Base abstract { public: virtual void Foo(const int) = 0; }; ref class Derived : public Base { public: virtual void Foo(int i) override { } }; If I then create an instance of Derived: int main(array<System::String ^> ^args) { Derived^ d = gcnew Derived; } it compiles without errors or warnings. When I run it, it throws the following exception and then terminates: An unhandled exception of type 'System.TypeLoadException' occurred in ClrVirtualTest.exe Additional information: Method 'Foo' in type 'Derived'...does not have an implementation. That exception seems to indicate that the const qualification of the parameter does affect the type of the function in C++/CLI (or, at least it affects overriding in some way). However, if I comment out the line containing the definition of Derived::Foo, the compiler reports the following error (on the line in main where the instance of Derived is instantiated): error C2259: 'Derived': cannot instantiate abstract class If I add the const qualifier to the parameter of Derived::Foo or remove the const qualifier from the parameter of Base::Foo, it compiles and runs with no errors. I would think that if the const qualification of the parameter affects the type of the function, I should get this error if the const qualification of the parameter in the derived class virtual function does not match the const qualification of the parameter in the base class virtual function. If I change the type of Derived::Foo's parameter from an int to a double, I get the following warning (in addition to the aforementioned error, C2259): warning C4490: 'override': incorrect use of override specifier; 'Derived::Foo' does not match a base ref class method So, my question is, effectively, does the const qualification of function parameters affect the type of the function in C++/CLI? If so, why does this compile and why are there no errors or warnings? If not, why is an exception thrown?

    Read the article

  • Google Maps, marker info window won't show up ?

    - by user296516
    Hi guys, I have written this code that loops through an array of lat/long coordinates and places a marker at each of the coordinate. Everything forks fine, exempt the info window won't appear once the marker is clicked. var ExpTowerIcon = new GIcon(); ExpTowerIcon.image = "tower.png"; ExpTowerIcon.iconSize = new GSize(75, 75); ExpTowerIcon.iconAnchor = new GPoint(37, 65); ExpTowerIcon.infoWindowAnchor = new GPoint(37, 20); var marker=new Array(); for ( i=0 ; i < lat.length ; i++ ) { var MarkerPoint = new GLatLng(lat[i],long[i]); marker[i] = new GMarker(MarkerPoint,{icon:ExpTowerIcon}) map.addOverlay( marker[i] ); GEvent.addListener( marker[i] , 'click', function() { marker[i].openInfoWindowHtml('Hello!') ; }); var polyline = new GPolyline([ new GLatLng(lat[i],long[i]) , new GLatLng(lat[i+1],long[i+1]) ], "#ff0000", 5); map.addOverlay(polyline); } Any ideas? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Jquery Ajax json Serializable

    - by willsonchan
    I am learing using jquery ajax to hander the JSON..i writre a demo code. HTMLCODE $(function () { $("#add").click(function () { var json = '{ "str":[{"Role_ID":"2","Customer_ID":"155","Brands":"Chloe;","Country_ID":"96;"}]}'; $.ajax({ url: "func.aspx/GetJson", type: "POST", contentType: "application/json", dataType: 'json', data: json, success: function (result) { alert(result); }, error: function () { alert("error"); } }); }); }); <div> <input type="button" value="add" id="add" /> </div> i got a input and bind a script function to it, now the proble is comeing.. my C# functiong like that. [WebMethod] public static string GetJson(object str) { return str.ToString();//good for work } [Serializable] public class TestClass { public TestClass() { } public TestClass(string role_id, string customer_id, string brands, string countryid) { this.Role_ID = role_id; this.Customer_ID = customer_id; this.Brands = brands; this.Country_ID = countryid; } public string Role_ID { get; set; } public string Customer_ID { get; set; } public string Brands { get; set; } public string Country_ID { get; set; } } when i user public static string GetJson(object str) everything is so good.~~ no error at all but . when i try to use my own class TestClass. firebug tell me that "Type 'TestClass' is not supported for deserialization of an array." .any body can give me help:XD

    Read the article

  • FullCalendar displaying last weeks events below this weeks events

    - by Brian
    I am developing an application to manage an On-Call calendar, using FullCalendar to render it. Most events are 1 week long, starting at 8:00 AM Tuesday and ending the following Tuesday at 8:00 AM. Another event, presumably with a different person on-call, will follow that event. During a hallway usability test, someone commented that the month calendar view was difficult to read because the previous weeks event is not at the top of the stack, instead rendering below the event that starts during that week. When being viewed, the eye perceives that it should go down 1 line to view the remaining timeline because the event from last week is there, instead of moving down to the following week. I investigated what I believe to be the problem: function segCmp(a, b) { return (b.msLength - a.msLength) * 100 + (a.event.start - b.event.start); } sorts the events for a row, but uses the length of the event in the calculation. Since the current week's event will have a longer duration, it always get sorted to the top. To test, I changed the start dates to Wednesday so the durations are closer. This cause the events to render how I would expect, with last weeks events at the top and this weeks at the bottom. I thought that if one of the events in the compare doesn't start that week, then it should only be compared based on the start times. I modified the function to be: function segCmp(a, b) { if (a.isStart == false || b.isStart == false) { return (a.event.start - b.event.start); } return (b.msLength - a.msLength) * 100 + (a.event.start - b.event.start); } This solved my problem, and the rendering now looks good - and passes the hallway test. What I don't know is if this would have an impact in other areas. I have taken a look at the other views (month, week, day) and they all seem to be rendering properly as well. I am just not familiar with FullCalendar enough to file a bug or feature request on this, or if this would even be considered a bug. I am wondering if what I modified is correct, or if it is not what a better modification would be to fix this issue. Thanks! Below I have the json results for what should be displayed: [{"title":"Person 1 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":12,"allDay":false,"start":"2010-11-30T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2010-12-07T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/12"}, {"title":"Person 2 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":13,"allDay":false,"start":"2010-12-07T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2010-12-14T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/13"}, {"title":"Person 3 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":14,"allDay":false,"start":"2010-12-14T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2010-12-21T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/14"}, {"title":"Person 4 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":15,"allDay":false,"start":"2010-12-21T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2010-12-28T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/15"}, {"title":"Person 5 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":16,"allDay":false,"start":"2010-12-28T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2011-01-04T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/16"}, {"title":"Person 6 - OnCall (OSS On Call)","id":17,"allDay":false,"start":"2011-01-04T15:00:00.0000000Z","end":"2011-01-11T15:00:00.0000000Z","editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/17"}, {"title":"Christmas","id":2,"allDay":true,"start":"2010-12-25T07:00:00.0000000Z","end":null,"editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/2"}, {"title":"New Years Eve","id":3,"allDay":true,"start":"2010-12-31T07:00:00.0000000Z","end":null,"editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/3"}, {"title":"New Years Day","id":4,"allDay":true,"start":"2011-01-01T07:00:00.0000000Z","end":null,"editable":false,"className":"fc-event-title-calendar","url":"/TimeManagement/Edit/4"}]

    Read the article

  • Need help with cycle in JS

    - by antiarchitect
    I have such function, that adds a grid of droppables: function AddClassroomDrops(grid, weeks, days, times) { for(week = 1; week <= weeks; week++) { for (day = 1; day <= days; day++) { for (time = 1; time <= times; time++ ) { Droppables.add('container_grid'+ grid + '_week' + week + '_day' + day + '_time' + time, { accept: 'pair', hoverclass : 'hovered_receiver', onDrop: function(pair, receiver) { new Ajax.Request( '/pairs/'+pair.id+'/update_on_drop', { method : 'put', parameters : { classroom : grid, week : week, day : day, time : time, container : receiver.id } } ); } }); } } } } The problem is that params of Ajax.Request (week, day, time) are always equal to weeks + 1, times + 1, days + 1. But they must vary according to the cycle.

    Read the article

  • Better way to call superclass method in ExtJS

    - by Rene Saarsoo
    All the ExtJS documentation and examples I have read suggest calling superclass methods like this: MyApp.MyPanel = Ext.extend(Ext.Panel, { initComponent: function() { // do something MyPanel specific here... MyApp.MyPanel.superclass.initComponent.call(this); } }); I have been using this pattern for quite some time and the main problem is, that when you rename your class then you also have to change all the calls to superclass methods. That's quite inconvenient, often I will forget and then I have to track down strange errors. But reading the source of Ext.extend() I discovered, that instead I could use the superclass() or super() methods that Ext.extend() adds to the prototype: MyApp.MyPanel = Ext.extend(Ext.Panel, { initComponent: function() { // do something MyPanel specific here... this.superclass().initComponent.call(this); } }); In this code renaming MyPanel to something else is simple - I just have to change the one line. But I have doubts... I haven't seen this documented anywhere and the old wisdom says, I shouldn't rely on undocumented behaviour. I didn't found a single use of these superclass() and supr() methods in ExtJS source code. Why create them when you aren't going to use them? Maybe these methods were used in some older version of ExtJS but are deprecated now? But it seems such a useful feature, why would you deprecate it? So, should I use these methods or not?

    Read the article

  • Open source / commercial alternative for jiffy.js?

    - by Marcel
    Hi, we'd like to measure "client side web site performance". i.e. we would like to have answers to the following questions: how long did it takt to load and render a webpage (including alle graphics scripts etc.) this bundled with additional informations like user-agent, operating system etc. a graphical tool to analyze the data would be perfect I know jiffy ( http://code.google.com/p/jiffy-web/wiki/Jiffy_js ) but that isn't maintained anymore. I would prefer either a hosted solution (like google analytics) or a java based solution that we deploy for ourselves. Do you know something like that? Thanks, Marc

    Read the article

  • Using argument (this) passed via element eventhandler

    - by Kel
    Hey guys, I want to use the argument I pass (this) in a JS function and treat it as an jQuery variable. Example: <script> function useMe(obj){ $(obj).val(); ... ... ... } </script> <select id="selectid" onChange="useMe(this)"> <option>......</option> </select> Is there a possibility to treat the passed argument as a jQuery element? Btw. I need to do it this way, because the select-element isn't created on load. The select element will be created later asynchronously. So, this won't work: $("select").each(function (i){ var select_id = $(this).attr("id"); $(this).change(function(e){ because it doesn't exist yet. Thanks for your help.

    Read the article

  • jQuery Collapse (with cookies), default open instead of closed?

    - by Christian
    Hi. I've got a jQuery snippet which basically allows a user to toggle a div, open or closed - their preference is saved in a cookie. (function($) { $.fn.extend({ collapse: function(options) { var defaults = { inactive : "inactive", active : "active", head : ".trigger", group : ".wrap-me-up", speed : 300, cookie : "collapse" }; // Set a cookie counter so we dont get name collisions var op = $.extend(defaults, options); cookie_counter = 0; return this.each(function() { // Increment cookie name counter cookie_counter++; var obj = $(this), sections = obj.find(op.head).addClass(op.inactive), panel = obj.find(op.group).hide(), l = sections.length, cookie = op.cookie + "_" + cookie_counter; // Look for existing cookies for (c=0;c<=l;c++) { var cvalue = $.cookie(cookie + c); if ( cvalue == 'open' + c ) { panel.eq(c).show(); panel.eq(c).prev().removeClass(op.inactive).addClass(op.active); }; }; sections.click(function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var num = sections.index(this); var cookieName = cookie + num; var ul = $(this).next(op.group); // If item is open, slide up if($(this).hasClass(op.active)) { ul.slideUp(op.speed); $(this).removeClass(op.active).addClass(op.inactive); $.cookie(cookieName, null, { path: '/', expires: 10 }); return } // Else slide down ul.slideDown(op.speed); $(this).addClass(op.active).removeClass(op.inactive); var cookieValue = 'open' + num; $.cookie(cookieName, cookieValue, { path: '/', expires: 10 }); }); }); } }); })(jQuery); Demo: http://christianbullock.com/demo/ I'm just wondering how I can display the list open as default, and have the div collapse when the header is clicked? Many thanks. Christian.

    Read the article

  • Printing problem

    - by Bandpay
    Hi there, Time to ask an odd question. window.print(); Prints only one page of 2 pages in IE8 & IE7 even the same prints both pages in FF. Now if I cancel the print dialog and just go to File - Print I get both pages in both IE & FF. window.print(); is included in ONLOAD Any idea why? Thanks Babak

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528  | Next Page >